Targeted Intraoperative Radiation Therapy As an Adjuvant to Surgery for the Treatment of Breast Cancer in England: A UK-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intrabeam

Author(s)

Moloney E1, Mashayekhi A1, Javanbakht M1, Prater C2
1Optimax Access Ltd & Device Access UK Ltd, Southampton, HAM, UK, 2Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (WB-EBRT) is the standard of care in the UK among patients with early invasive breast cancer (BC) following breast-conserving surgery but is associated with short- and long-term adverse effects. The INTRABEAM® device may be used to deliver adjuvant targeted intraoperative radiation therapy (TARGIT-IORT) to patients with early BC at the time of surgery, while reducing treatment-associated burden, resource utilization, and exposure to radiation and relevant toxicities. An economic evaluation was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of INTRABEAM over a lifetime horizon, from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.

METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the long-term costs and effectiveness of INTRABEAM compared to WB-EBRT, among a patient population eligible for breast-conserving surgery. A six-state model structure was utilized to capture patient progression from recurrence-free to recurrent cancer health states, with breast and non-breast cancer-related mortality also modeled. Transition probabilities were informed by published literature, with parametric models used to estimate mortality based on patient-level data. The model was developed probabilistically to account for uncertainty in model parameters, with a Monte Carlo simulation performed. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated, with results presented in the form of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS: Base-case results indicated that the INTRABEAM device would dominate WB-EBRT over a lifetime, resulting in cost savings (-£4,583; INTRABEAM = £4,821, WB-EBRT = £9,404) and QALY gains (0.53; INTRABEAM = 14.61, WB-EBRT = 14.08). Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that the cost, and utility, associated with the ‘Distant Recurrence’ health state was the most impactful parameter on overall results.

CONCLUSIONS: This modeling study indicated that an innovative technology developed for the delivery of TARGIT-IORT (INTRABEAM) has the potential to improve clinical outcomes among patients with early BC undergoing surgery, while reducing costs to the UK NHS.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE506

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Medical Devices

Disease

Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×