Validity and Reliability of the EQ-5D-5L and Propr in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Author(s)
Xu R1, Dong D2
1Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L and the preference-based PROMIS Preference score (PROPr) and compare their performance in Chinese patients with Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
METHODS:
Data used in this study were obtained via a web-based survey coordinated by a national SMA patient organization in 2021. Individuals who were formally diagnosed with SMA, and aged ≥ 16 years were invited to complete the EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-29, as well as questions assessing their demographics, socioeconomics, and health status. Acceptability (missing data, ceiling and floor effects), convergent and divergent validity (Spearman's correlation coefficient), and known-group validity (analysis of variance) of the EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-29 and their agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) were assessed.
RESULTS:
A total of 137 individuals (Age: 16 ~ 47 years; female: 52.6%) with SMA completed the questionnaires. Ceiling effects were observed for four dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L ranging from 29.2% (usual activities) to 49.6% (self-care); no participant reported the best (11111) or worst health state of the EQ-5D-5L. Regarding PROMIS-29, significant floor effects were observed for the subscale of pain intensity VAS (27%), pain interference (32.1%), and physical function (45.3%). All hypothesized associations between EQ-5D-5L/PROMIS-29 and PedsQoL core questionnaire or neuromuscular module were confirmed, and dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L were significantly correlated with corresponding subscales of the PROMIS-29 (e.g., r mobility-physical functioning=-0.72 and r pain/discomfort-pain intensity=0.51), supporting convergent validity. Both EQ-5D-5L and PROPr scores differentiated between impaired functional groups, demonstrating good discriminative ability.
CONCLUSIONS:
The EQ-5D-5L and PROPr assessed by the PROMIS-29 are valid preference-based measures for individuals with SMA. The PROPr yields a considerably lower utility score than the EQ-5D-5L in this patient group. Their performance should be further explored in the other rare disease groups.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
EE524
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Health State Utilities, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Performance-based Outcomes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas