Utilizing Time-Driven Activity Based Costing to Explore Variation in the Value of Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Repair
Author(s)
Dean M1, Etges AP2, Cherian NJ3, LaPorte ZL4, Dowley K5, Torabian K4, Eberlin C6, Best MJ7, Martin SD4
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Avant-garde Health, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Somerville, MA, USA, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 5Massachusetts General Hospital, South Boston, MA, USA, 6Massachusetts General Hospital, PEORIA, IL, USA, 7Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
By integrating postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with time-driven activity-based costing, this study aims to (1) quantify variations in the value of hip arthroscopy (HA) for acetabular labral repair and (2) explore patient-level characteristics (e.g., demographics, comorbidities, preoperative PROMs, and intraoperative variables) that may contribute to this variation.METHODS:
Using a single surgeon database, we identified 161 patients undergoing outpatient primary HA for labral repair between 2015-2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up. To calculate patient value, 2-year postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were divided by time-driven activity-based costs and multiplied by a constant to set the study average to 100. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models were employed to identify factors underlying variation in value.RESULTS:
Variation in HA value ranged from 25.4 to 216.4 (mean ± standard deviation: 100 ± 38.4), with a 3.0-fold variation in value between patients in the 10th and 90th percentile. Higher value was significantly associated with Tönnis grade 0 (12.2-point increase, p=0.025), no prior contralateral hip arthroscopy (17.3-point increase, p=0.039), higher preoperative PROMs (0.52-point increase per 1-unit increase, p<0.001), and no bone marrow aspirate concentrate or microfracture (33.8-point increase, p<0.001). Variation in value was also significantly associated with osteoplasty type and labral treatment technique (p<0.05 for both). In contrast, operative year, age, gender, body mass index, race, ethnicity, Outerbridge grade, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were not independently associated with value. A model incorporating these factors as fixed effects and the surgery center as a random effect explained 42.3% of the observed variation in value.CONCLUSIONS:
This study demonstrated wide variation in the value of hip arthroscopy that was mostly strongly associated with procedure type and preoperative PROMs, while patient demographics contributed minimal independent variability. These findings may promote optimization of the hip arthroscopy care pathway to reduce variation and deliver higher-value care.Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
PCR114
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas