Patient Survey Completion By Touchpoints in a Mailed Survey Methodology
Author(s)
Carlyle M1, Belland A1, Webb N2, Essoi B1, Allenback G3
1Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 2Optum, Orlando, FL, USA, 3Optum Life Sciences, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Presentation Documents
BACKGROUND: Researchers are often challenged to increase survey completion without overburdening respondents. Evaluating survey completion by touchpoint may provide guidance on the best number of touchpoints to use. OBJECTIVES: To review survey completion by touchpoint across multiple direct-to-patient mailed survey studies. METHODS: A total of 7,901 patients responded to 7 direct-to-patient, mailed surveys across a range of therapeutic areas. Surveys were fielded between 2016 and 2022. Patients were identified from the Optum Research Database (a large, national administrative claims database) using study-specific inclusion criteria and were invited to participate by mail. All studies included three touchpoints: initial mailed survey packet, reminder postcard (sent 2 weeks later), and second mailed survey packet to non-responders (sent 2 weeks later). Two studies utilized a fourth touchpoint (a third mailed survey packet) for select cohorts with limited sample size to increase response rates. Most studies utilized a post-paid $25 incentive. Insurance type, fielding year and study methodology were assessed for impact on response rate. RESULTS: On average, respondents required 1.8 touchpoints and 25.5 days to return completed surveys. Among respondents, half of completed surveys (50.9%) were received following the first touchpoint, 19.3% following the second touchpoint and 29.8% following the third touchpoint. There was little difference in timing of receipt of completed surveys by insurance type. In studies that utilized four touchpoints, touchpoints three and four contributed 33.6% of received responses. CONCLUSIONS: With nearly 30% of completed surveys occurring following a third touchpoint, data continues to support the use of up to three touchpoints for optimal response to direct-to-patient mailed surveys. In studies with a limited sample, a fourth touchpoint may be useful to increase response rates.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
MSR16
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Patient Engagement, Survey Methods, Surveys & Expert Panels
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas