Comparison of Real-World Later-Line Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Microsatellite-Instability High (MSI-H) Versus Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the United States (US)

Author(s)

Dixon M, Gu J
Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that patients with MSI-H or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) mCRC have worse outcomes than those with MSS or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) mCRC, but this mostly relates to first-line (1L) treatment. We compared time to next treatment or death (TTNTd) and overall survival (OS) in patients in the US with MSI-H/dMMR vs MSS/pMMR tumors on second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) non-immunotherapy standard of care mCRC treatment.

METHODS: Observational study using Flatiron Health electronic health record data on patients with mCRC diagnosed on/after 01/01/2013 who had received 1 line of prior therapy. Inverse probability (IP) weighting was used to control for baseline covariates (age, gender, race, disease stage at diagnosis, primary tumor location, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status, insurance type, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, treatment class). TTNTd and OS from start of 2L/3L therapy were analyzed using the IP-weighted Kaplan-Meier estimator. The association between MSI/MMR status and TTNTd/OS was evaluated using an IP-weighted Cox proportional hazards model with additional adjustment for covariates with a standardized mean difference of >0.10 after IP weighting to account for residual covariate imbalance.

RESULTS: For the IP-weighted 2L analysis, 110 patients had MSI-H and 2307 had MSS tumors; corresponding numbers for 3L were 50 and 1110. IP-weighted survival estimates were numerically shorter in MSI-H vs MSS tumors at both 2L (median TTNTd 6.24 vs 7.92 months; median OS 15.29 vs 17.09 months) and 3L (median TTNTd 5.29 vs 5.78 months; median OS 7.00 vs 11.47 months), but the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: There was a trend towards poorer clinical outcomes in patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC than in those with MSS/pMMR mCRC at both 2L and 3L, but this did not reach significance after robust adjustment for potential confounders. Regardless, the results highlight the need for more effective later-line treatment options for mCRC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

CO53

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×