Impact of Huntington's Disease on Driving: A Review of Driving Simulator Measures and Association with Clinical Outcomes Assessments

Author(s)

Hawe E1, Castro CV2, Johannensen J3, Belisario JM1, Mordin M2, Sawant R3, Petrillo Billet J3
1RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK, 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 3Sage Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA

Objectives: Huntington’s disease (HD) is a genetic, neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor and behavioral symptoms and decline in cognitive abilities relevant to everyday function. Although scales of gross functional status are available, demonstrating the functional benefits of an intervention in HD remains challenging due to lack of standardized and sensitive measures of functional capacity. In recognition of this gap, a critical review was undertaken to summarize literature addressing the impact of HD on driving (as measured by simulator measures) and the relationship between clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) and driving simulator measures in an HD population.

Methods: A targeted literature review identified publications, including driving simulator and cognitive function assessments in HD. Simulated driving outcomes were grouped into categories: accidents; attention/reaction; distance control; general errors; infractions; lane position; speed. Standardized mean differences (Hedge’s g method) were generated to evaluate differences in measures between HD and community control samples. Relationships between driving measures and COAs were explored using Pearson correlation.

Results: Four publications were identified. Driving outcomes worse in HD than controls included higher frequency of accidents, tickets, errors, and some reaction time measures. Pooled estimates of effect size were not calculated as most measures were only in a single study and studies reported on multiple measures. The strength of correlations between COAs (cognitive tests, UHDRS) and driving measures ranged from low to high, and varied across driving measure categories: attention/reaction time (0.48 to 0.85), lane position (0.04 to 0.64), driving speed (-0.35 to 0.52) and across COA measures. The Trail Making Test, commonly used in clinical evaluation of fitness to drive, was moderately correlated with speed (0.43) and lane position (0.49).

Conclusions: Many measures are used to assess the impact of HD on driving performance. Simulated driving performance shows promise as a potential functional outcome measure for therapeutic development in HD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

CO17

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×