Hospitalization in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis with Hyperphosphatemia Randomized to Tenapanor or Sevelamer
Author(s)
Stephenson B1, Chertow G2, Yang Y3, Rosenbaum D3
1Ardelyx, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, 2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA, 3Ardelyx, Freemont, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: In patients on maintenance dialysis, hyperphosphatemia is a risk factor for mortality and hospitalization. Tenapanor is an investigational, first-in-class, phosphate absorption inhibitor, providing a novel, non-binder approach to treating hyperphosphatemia. The PHREEDOM study was a long-term Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of tenapanor to treat hyperphosphatemia in patients on maintenance dialysis (hemo- or peritoneal dialysis). This post-hoc analysis aims to identify the effects of tenapanor relative to sevelamer on hospitalization and length of stay. METHODS: The PHREEDOM study was a 52-week study consisting of a 26-week, open-label, randomized treatment period with a 12-week placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal period, followed by a 14-week open label safety extension period. Patients on maintenance dialysis with serum phosphorus ≥ 6.0 mg/dL and a 1.5 mg/dL increase in serum phosphorus following phosphate binder washout were randomized 3:1 to receive one 30 mg tenapanor tablet twice daily or sevelamer per package insert for a 52-week period. At end of randomized treatment period, all patients in the tenapanor arm were re-randomized 1:1 to tenapanor or placebo for the randomized withdrawal period, followed by tenapanor for the safety extension period. Sevelamer was used as a safety control for the comparison of serious adverse events and hospitalizations. Results followed the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who experienced any serious adverse event leading to hospitalization at 26 weeks was 17.4% in patients receiving tenapanor and 23.4% in patients receiving sevelamer; the average duration of hospitalization was longer in patients receiving sevelamer, compared to patients receiving tenapanor (9.75 days ± 9.8 days vs. 8.86 days ± 8.28 days). CONCLUSIONS: Patients randomized to tenapanor had lower rates of hospitalization and shorter lengths of stay when hospitalization occurred, relative to patients randomized to sevelamer.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)
Code
PUK2
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinician Reported Outcomes
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders