Trends in Prevalence, Treatment Patterns, Myelosuppression, and Burden on the Healthcare System Among Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

Author(s)

Epstein RS1, Nelms J2, Moran D3, Girman C4, Krenitsky J1, Chioda M3
1Epstein Health, LLC, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA, 2Lucyna Health and Safety Solutions, LLC, Tampa, FL, USA, 3G1 Therapeutics, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 4CERobs Consulting, LLC, Wrightsville Beach, NC, USA

OBJECTIVES : To estimate the real-world prevalence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), map the treatment journey, and quantify healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with myelosuppression, a complication of SCLC treatment, induced by chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.

METHODS : This was a retrospective study of patients with SCLC aged 65 years, identified from linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare (SEER-Medicare) data curated between January 2005 and December 2015. Chemotherapy use was identified and classified as first, second, or third line, depending on the temporal sequence in which regimens were prescribed. Across the years 2012–2015, proportions of patients completing 4- or 6-cycle chemotherapy regimens, and proportions of patients who had hospital admissions associated with myelosuppression, or who used granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF), blood or platelet transfusions, or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were calculated.

RESULTS : SCLC prevalence peaked in 2009 and declined thereafter. Prevalence was highest among white patients, male patients, and those in their seventies. Chemotherapy was administered as first- or second-line treatment in 77.4% and 22.1% of cases, respectively. Among patients who received first-line chemotherapy, and for whom a second treatment was recorded, radiotherapy was administered in 98.4% of cases. Across 2012–2015, 57.8% of patients completed the guideline-recommended 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy. During the same period, among all patients treated with chemotherapy, 74.3% experienced ≥1 inpatient admission associated with myelosuppression (anemia, 52.8%; neutropenia, 33.3%; thrombocytopenia, 17.0%; pancytopenia, 14.2%). HCRU included rescue interventions with G-CSF in 48.4% of patients, ESAs in 11.0% of patients, and transfusions in 26.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS : Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of care for patients with SCLC. Slightly over half of patients from the SEER-Medicare databases completed the recommended number of cycles. HCRU associated with myelosuppression was prominent across all study years, suggesting that myelosuppression imposes a substantial burden on elderly patients with SCLC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN246

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Health & Insurance Records Systems, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×