Budget IMPACT Analysis of a Flash Glycose Monitoring Technology in Greece

Author(s)

Siskou O1, Koutsovasilis A2, Doupis J3, Karagkouni I4, Konstantakopoulou O4, Galanis P4, Kaitelidou D4
1Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Nursing Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ATHENS, Greece, 2Diabetes Center, Saint Panteleimon General Hospital of Nikaia, Piraeus, Greece, 3Diabetes Department and Clinical Research Center, Iatriko Palaiou Falirou Medical Center, Athens, Greece, 4Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Nursing Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES : Flash Glycose Monitoring (FGM) is an innovative technology for glucose control that helps patients to avoid hypoglycemias and remain within Time in Range. Currently, only patients with DM1 are covered for using FGM by the National Organization for the Provision of Healthcare (EOPYY). Thus, we evaluated the economic consequences of FGM reimbursement expansion:a) in DM2 patients subjected to intensive insulin (N≥3 injections daily) b) in all insulin-treated patients with DM2

METHODS : A Budget Impact Analysis Model (ΒΙΑM) was used, with a time horizon of three years. Resource utilization included the cost of all non-durables in regards to self-glycose monitoring and the cost of management of severe and non-severe hypoglycemia events. Analyses were conducted from the EOPYY perspective, taking into consideration a novel reimbursement model of progressive volume based price deduction for sensor and zero price for reader (as it is provided free of charge)

RESULTS : In the case of simultaneous coverage of FGM for both DM1 and DM2 patients, savings result from the very first year, increasing with the increase of the number of beneficiaries and peak during the third year. Specifically, savings reach the amount of a) € 1.9 million in the case of coverage of intensive insulin DM1 and DM2 patients and b) € 0.78 million in the case of coverage of all patients under insulin. The cumulative savings over three years amount to € 3.266 million for case (a) and € 1.3 million for case (b)

CONCLUSIONS : Given the reduction of severe and non-severe hypoglycemia events for patients using the FGM technology, when compared with the SMBG (based on the relevant literature), and consequently, the cost savings achieved for EOPYY, the FGM technology is considered as of high value and, thus, the expansion of reimbursement coverage to DM2 patients is recommended.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PDB21

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Medical Devices, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×