Calcimimetic Use in United States (US) Hemodialysis Facilities in First Two Years after Launch of Etelcalcetide
Author(s)
Stephens M1, Cheng S2, Desai P3, Fox K4, Goodman W3, Kendrick J5
1Prima Health Analytics, Weymouth, MA, USA, 2Amgen, Inc., Austin, TX, USA, 3Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 4Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks , CA, USA, 5University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
OBJECTIVES: This study described control of parathyroid hormone (PTH), and corresponding corrected calcium (Ca) and phosphorous in adults initiating calcimimetics during 2018 in small dialysis organizations after the introduction of etelcalcetide. METHODS: This retrospective study using Visonex® Clarity electronic health records between 10/1/2017 and 12/31/2019 identified adults ≥18 years of age receiving in-center hemodialysis as either a cinacalcet or etelcalcetide initiator based on their first calcimimetic use in 2018 (index date) with no prior calcimimetic use in the 3 months pre-index date. Patients were stratified by PTH at baseline and were followed for 15 months from index date. Sub-groups of patients who were persistent on a single calcimimetic for 15 months and of patients who switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide were also analyzed. RESULTS: 677 patients initiated cinacalcet and 711 initiated etelcalcetide. Mean PTH (pg/mL), phosphorus and Ca (mg/dL) at baseline were 864, 5.9 and 9.3 for cinacalcet and 804, 5.9 and 9.4 for etelcalcetide. Over 15 months of follow-up the proportion of initiators with baseline PTH 600-<800 considered “in-target” (monthly average PTH <600) increased from 48% to 62% with cinacalcet and from 56% to 86% with etelcalcetide; among those with baseline PTH 800-<1000, the proportion increased from 30% to 64% with cinacalcet and 31% to 59% with etelcalcetide; and among those with baseline PTH ≥1000 this proportion increased from 14% to 41% with cinacalcet and 12% to 58% with etelcalcetide. A similar pattern was observed for persistent users (n=646). For patients switching from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide (n=183), the proportion of patients considered “in-target” increased from 22% in the month prior to switch to 51% in month 6 post-switch. CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating calcimimetics at higher baseline PTH had poorer biomarker control than patients starting at lower PTH. Patients switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide had improvements in PTH control post-switch.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)
Code
PDB30
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Biologics and Biosimilars, Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Drugs, Urinary/Kidney Disorders