IMPACT OF ADHERENCE ON VIRAL SUPPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIV RECEIVING BICTEGRAVIR OR DOLUTEGRAVIR REGIMENS

Author(s)

Sax PE1, Eron J2, Frick A3, Milligan S3, Radtchenko J3, Ramgopal M4, Santiago S5, Elion R6
1Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 3Trio Health Analytics, La Jolla, CA, USA, 4Midway Immunology and Research Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA, 5Care Resource, Miami, FL, USA, 6George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA

OBJECTIVES

Previous real-world studies have shown (1) reduced adherence with more complex, multi-tablet regimens (MTR) relative to simple, single-tablet regimens (STR) and (2) reduced virologic control with decreased regimen adherence. This study evaluated adherence and virologic suppression with second-generation integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) bictegravir (BIC) and dolutegravir (DTG) in patients with HIV.

METHODS

EMR, prescription and dispensing data for 2,217 patients initiating STR BIC/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) or DTG/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) or MTR DTG + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (DTG+TDF/FTC) or DTG+TAF/FTC between August 2013 - August 2019 were collected from 5 US practices. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6 months. To determine treatment effects on adherence, we used (1) multiple imputation with predictive posterior matching for missing baseline measures, (2) mixed effects logistic regression to adjust for source heterogeneity, and (3) propensity score matching (PSM) using imputed baseline labs and demographics, allowing for squares and first order interactions between all included predictors. In addition to adherence, we assessed viral suppression (<200 copies/mL) in a subset of 655 patients at 6 months (-1 week to + 2 months).

RESULTS

In observed data, 80% PDC was significantly higher (p<0.01) with STR BIC/FTC/TAF compared to any dolutegravir-regimen and with STR DTG/ABC/3TC in comparison to MTR DTG+TDF/FTC or DTG+TAF/FTC (p<0.01). After PSM, adherence was only significantly different with STR BIC/FTC/TAF compared to MTR DTG+TDF/FTC or DTG+TAF/FTC (p<0.01). Viral suppression at 6 months for patients with measures (n=655) was favorably impacted by PDC ≥80% (OR 2.27 [1.26-4.07] p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with studies of legacy regimens, these data suggest that simplifying 2nd generation INSTI-containing regimens to a single tablet aids in adherence and greater adherence improves virologic outcomes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PIN4

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×