A REVIEW OF NON-DISEASE SPECIFIC HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE MEASURES WITH RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY EVIDENCE IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER

Author(s)

Castro CV1, Mordin M2, Islam Z3, Tu N3, Hackshaw MD3, Salas M3
1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2RTI Health Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 3Daiichi Sankyo, Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: While disease-specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are preferable, appropriately validated generic PROMs can also gather important insights not otherwise captured in disease-specific PROMs. Our aim is to identify and describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) PROMs which have evidence of reliability and validity among women with breast cancer for potential use in patients treated for breast cancer.

METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases from 01/09-08/19 to identify articles that contain psychometric properties (e.g. reliability, validity) of HRQoL PROMs used in patients with breast cancer (excluding surgery). English-language publications that reported psychometric properties of HRQoL PROMs were included.

RESULTS: A total of 613 unique records were identified. Of the 130 full-text articles reviewed, 80 presented psychometric data for PROMs used in breast cancer, including survivors. A total of 34 papers presented breast-cancer-specific PROMs (e.g. EORTC QLQ-BR23) and are reported elsewhere. This abstract focuses on the 22 papers that described psychometric properties of 20 non-breast cancer-specific HRQoL PROMs. Six of the PROMs were generic HRQoL measures (e.g. SF-12, EQ-5D, WHOQOL). The majority of the PROMs (14/20) were cancer-specific and focused on general HRQoL (e.g. Cancer Behavior Inventory), symptom inventories (e.g. PRO-CTCAE), or measured individual symptoms, concepts, or treatment-related toxicities (e.g. alopecia, anxiety, cognitive function). All identified generic measures demonstrated adequate reliability (e.g. test-retest, internal consistency), except for the SF-12; all demonstrated acceptable validity. Similarly, adequate reliability data was identified in 11/14 cancer-specific PROMs. Only 2 of 14 cancer-specific PROMs did not have specific validity data.

CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of both reliability and validity is necessary when choosing a PROM. Most, but not all, of the identified non-breast-cancer-specific HRQoL PROMs have evidence of reliability and validity among patients with breast cancer. These PROMs can help provide additional insight to patients experience with treatment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PCN323

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×