COMPARING PATIENT-RELEVANT ENDPOINT WITH CLINICAL ENDPOINT IN A RARE DISEASE: THE CASE OF METASTATIC MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH AVELUMAB

Author(s)

Bharmal M1, Nolte S2, Lebbe C3, Mortier L4, Brohl AS5, Fazio N6, Grob JJ7, Pusceddu S8, Hanna GJ9, Hassel JC10, Kiecker F11, Ellers-Lenz B12, Bajars M13, Güzel G12, Nghiem P14, Hunger M2, Schlichting M15, Henry-Szatkowski M16, D'Angelo SP17
1EMD Serono, Rockland, MA, USA, 2ICON GMbH, Munich, Germany, 3Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France, 4Lille Hospital, Lille, France, 5Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA, 6European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy, 7Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM Hospital, Marseille, France, 8Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, 9Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, 10Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, 11Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 12Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 13EMD Serono Inc., Billerica, MA, USA, 14University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 15Global Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Medical Writing, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 16ICON plc, Lyon, France, 17Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: In this international, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT02155647), treatment-naive patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) received avelumab 10 mg/kg treatment every 2 weeks with a follow-up of ≥15 months. In this preplanned sub-analysis, a patient-relevant endpoint of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) deterioration-free survival (QFS) was evaluated in relation to the typically used clinical endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS: HRQOL outcomes were assessed using the disease-specific Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) and the generic EQ-5D questionnaires. QFS was defined as a definite deterioration in terms of HRQOL, with “deterioration” defined as a patient reaching or exceeding a predefined minimal important difference threshold of deterioration at least once during the study and no further improvement thereafter. QFS was reported as (1) median QFS time in months and (2) QFS rates (ie, percentage of patients who had deteriorated at 6 and 12 months). Median QFS and QFS rates were qualitatively compared with median PFS and PFS rates, respectively.

RESULTS: In 116 patients enrolled in this study, the HRQOL questionnaire compliance rate was over 75% across the study period. Median QFS was longer across all HRQOL scores (range of medians, 4.5-20.9 months) when compared with median PFS (4.1 months; 95% CI: 1.4-6.1 months). Furthermore, QFS rates were consistently higher/better (6-month data: range, 49%-72%; 12-month data: range, 40%-58%) compared with PFS rates of 41% and 31% at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings show unique, long-term HRQOL data for a rare condition, metastatic MCC. The substantially longer median QFS and substantially higher QFS rates compared with PFS estimates suggest patient-relevant, positive outcomes in the context of an aggressive cancer like MCC, with several patients reporting stable or improved HRQOL with avelumab treatment across time points.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PCN8

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×