COMPARISON OF WOUND CLOSURE IN CHRONIC LOWER EXTREMITY ULCERS BETWEEN SINGLE-USE NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY AND TRADITIONAL NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY: A REAL WORLD ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Patel A1, Delhougne G2, Nherera L3
1Smith & Nephew Inc, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2Smith & Nephew, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 3Smith & Nephew, Dallas Fort Worth, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES

:
Evidence for single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (sNPWT) in managing surgical incisions is demonstrated across surgical indications. However, there is limited evidence in chronic wounds. Recently, a randomized clinical trial demonstrated superior clinical outcomes for sNPWT compared to tNPWT in lower extremity ulcers (LEU). The aim of this study was to examine wound closure in sNPWT and tNPWT in chronic LEU patients from a real-world evidence perspective

METHODS

:
This retrospective cohort study was conducted by identifying diabetic foot or venous leg ulcers from an outpatient wound clinic EMR from 2014 to 2018. The treatment period began with the first application of NPWT and continued until the LEU closed or the patient was lost to follow-up. Patients were excluded if they received both types of NPWT; had missing clinical information; and had their NPWT treatment started more than 60 days from the start of the wound episode. Patients were matched on demographic characteristics, comorbidities and initial wound surface area using propensity score matching. Wound closure was reported descriptively and estimated using multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for days before NPWT treatment start.

RESULTS

:
One-to-one propensity score matching method matched 146 sNPWT to tNPWT patients with initial surface area of 10.93 cm2 and 10.71 cm2, respectively. Descriptive analysis estimated that sNPWT improved wound closure (46.58% vs 34.93%; p-value=0.0429) while regression analysis estimated sNPWT wounds were 89% more likely to close (OR=1.89; 95% CI=1.02-3.51; p-value=0.0423). Before matching, there were 199 sNPWT and 590 tNPWT patients with mean initial surface area of 9.65 cm2 and 28.26 cm2, respectively. Still, descriptive analysis estimated that sNPWT had statistically significant higher wound closure rate (51.26% vs 38.47%; p-value=0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

:
In chronic lower extremity wounds sNPWT validated the results of the previously published RCT in demonstrating a higher wound closure rate in a real world setting to tNPWT.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PMD45

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Medical Devices

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Medical Devices

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×