A CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE SINGLE-DOSE VERSUS MULTIPLE-DOSE APPROACHES OF SURFACTANT USE IN MECONIUM ASPIRATION SYNDROME IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN QATAR

Author(s)

Abdelaal M1, Valappil R2, Alsokhni O2, Babiker A2, Al-Badriyeh D1
1Qatar University, Doha, Qatar, 2Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

OBJECTIVES

In neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Qatar, while most clinicians follow the recommended single-dose approach of surfactant administration in the management of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), it seems that several choose instead to administer multiple subsequent doses of the surfactant, assuming an enhanced efficacy. This study was to compare the different surfactant dosing regimens in MAS management in NICU settings, from both clinical and economic aspects.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of critically ill neonates with MAS receiving single-dose surfactant versus multiple-doses at NICUs in Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Qatar. Clinical data of neonates were extracted from patient medical records of HMC from 2014 to 2018. A decision-analytic model from the hospital's perspective was constructed to follow possible consequences of the use of either option. Primary endpoints were (i) treatment success defined as the improvement in oxygenation over baseline 24 h after treatment, evaluated by the reduction of oxygen index (OI) to less than 10, and (ii) the overall direct medical cost of therapy.

RESULTS

Based on a population size of 60 patients, multiple-doses achieved a success of 53.3% versus a 56.7% with the single-dosing of surfactant (risk ratio = 1.0769; 95% CI, 0.5465 – 2.1222; P = 0.839). With a non-significant difference in effectiveness between the two approached, and a cost-saving of US$ 18904 associated with the single-dose approach of surfactant administration, the multiple-dose regimen is found to be dominated by the single-dose regimen of the surfactant. Sensitivity analysis concluded model insensitivity to input uncertainties, except in relation to NICU stay and cost of mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first clinical and economics analysis among different surfactant regimens in MAS. The multiple dosing of surfactant increased the overall cost of therapy, without an significant increase in the effectiveness of the surfactant against MAS.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PIH23

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs, Pediatrics, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×