COMPLICATIONS, HEALTH RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HARDWARE REMOVAL WITHIN 1-YEAR AFTER OPEN REDUCTION INTERNAL FIXATION OF HUMERUS FRACTURES

Author(s)

Chitnis AS1, Amoloja T1, Vanderkarr M2, Folly E3, Sparks C4, Holy C5
1Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2DePuy Synthes, Inc., Bay Village, OH, USA, 3Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, MA, USA, 4DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA, 5Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES : Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is used successfully in providing pain relief, anatomic reduction, and overall fracture stability for traumatic humerus fractures. In some cases of humeral fracture fixation, hardware removal is required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with hardware removal within 1 year after ORIF.

METHODS : A retrospective observational cohort study was designed using the IBM Marketscan Commercial and Medicare databases between 2010 and 2017. Participants ≥18 years, diagnosed with humerus fractures, and treated with ORIF (index) in an inpatient setting were identified. Inclusion required a continuous enrollment between 6-month pre-index and 1-year post-discharge from index hospitalization. Patients with polytrauma 6 months prior to index were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on post-surgical hardware removal identified over 1-year period after index discharge. Outcomes compared between patients with and without hardware removal were complication rates including infections and nonunion; healthcare resource utilization in terms of all-cause readmission and emergency visits; and all-cause costs of post-index discharge treatment.

RESULTS : A total of 6,413 patients with ORIF for humerus fractures were identified. The patients were mostly female (67.0%) with a mean (SD) age of 59.5 (19.8) years. Over the 1-year period, 12.3% had hardware removed. Patients with hardware removal had statistically significantly higher rates of infection (20.5% vs 4.3%), non-union (27.0% vs 8.7%), emergency visits (36.5% vs 29.5%) and readmission rates (40.0%vs 19.6%) (All p<0.0001). The mean (SD) all-cause costs post-index discharge was statistically significantly higher ($80,086 [$86,123] vs $51,880 [$69,962]) among the patients with hardware removal as compared to those without (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS : Complication rates and healthcare resource utilization were significantly higher with 54% increased post-discharge costs in patients requiring hardware removal after ORIF for humerus fractures.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PIT15

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Medical Devices

Disease

Medical Devices, Surgery

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×