COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED MELANOMA- A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Author(s)

Chang CY1, Malone D2
1University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

Numerous immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently available and multiple cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) have been conducted. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of ICIs for advanced melanoma.

METHODS:

A literature search was identified in PubMed and EMBASE using ICI product names and “cost-effectiveness.” Studies were evaluated based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) patient population was advanced melanoma; 2) evaluated one or more ICI agents; 3) were original investigations, not review articles; 4) was an economic evaluation; and 5) published in English. Data was abstracted including: methods; country; interventions; perspective; time horizon; model structure; sources of data; and major findings. Quality of reporting was assessed by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS).

RESULTS:

Ten CEAs evaluating ICIs for advanced melanoma were identified. One economic evaluation was a cost-benefit analysis, one was a cost-effectiveness with life-months as the measure of effectiveness, and eight were cost-quality-adjusted life year (QALY) studies. For cost-utility studies, utility values were derived from generic preference base (i.e., EuroQol 5-dimension tool), direct preference base (i.e., standard gable and time trade off), and disease specific tools (i.e., European organization for research and treatment of cancer). Seven studies used a health payer perspective, while two studies used a societal perspective. However, societal-perspective studies did not include indirect costs. Studies of ICI relative to chemotherapy had ICER values less than $90,871 per quality-QALY. Among three ICI, pembrolizumab was more cost-effective than nivolumab and ipilumumab, and nivolumab is more cost-effective than ipilumumab.

CONCLUSIONS:

This systematic review of CEAs identified 10 studies involving ICIs. Across all studies using cost/QALY outcomes, the ICER values were less than $90,871 per QALY. Thus, based on a threshold of $100,000/QALY, ICIs appear to be cost-effective relative to chemotherapy for advanced melanoma.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PCN69

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×