ECONOMIC BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERE ADVERSE EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER TREATED WITH FIRST-LINE EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS

Author(s)

Lejeune D1, Pavilack M2, Dersarkissian M3, Fernandes A2, Duh MS4, Subramanian J5
1Analysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 3Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 5Saint Lukes Cancer Institute/University of Missouri at Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA

BACKGROUND: Approximately 6–49% of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with first- and second-generation (1/2G) epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in trials experience severe adverse events (SAEs). The real-world economic burden of such SAEs has not been studied.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate incremental economic burden associated with SAEs in patients with mNSCLC treated with first-line (1L) EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS: The IQVIATM Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims – US database (Q2/2012–Q1/2017) was used to identify adults treated with 1/2G 1L EGFR-TKIs (first dispensing defined index) for mNSCLC with ≥1 lung cancer diagnosis code, no lung surgery claims, and no administration of other mNSCLC treatments within 3 months pre-index. SAEs were selected from EGFR-TKI prescribing information (cardiac and cerebrovascular [CV] events, interstitial lung disease [ILD], diarrhea, renal failure, skin and ocular disorders, hepatotoxicity, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia [MAHA], gastrointestinal perforation) and identified based on hospitalization claims. Adjusted healthcare resource utilization (HRU) rate ratios (RR) and cost differences (CD) comparing patients with and without SAEs were estimated using multivariate Poisson and linear regression, respectively.

RESULTS: Among 1,646 patients, 86.9% were treated with erlotinib, 12.1% with afatinib, 1.0% with gefitinib. Overall, patients with SAEs had higher rates of hospitalizations (RR=6.15; p<0.05) and outpatient visits (RR=1.21; p<0.05) versus without SAEs. Select SAEs with the greatest burden of hospitalization were MAHA (RR=4.21; p<0.05) and cardiac and CV events (RR=4.03; p<0.05). MAHA (RR=1.34; p<0.05) and ILD (RR=1.20; p<0.05) were associated with the greatest outpatient visit burden. High incremental HRU contributed to higher costs among patients with versus without SAEs, overall (CD=$4,700; p<0.05) and in the analysis of select SAEs (e.g., MAHA CD=$10,143; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: SAEs are associated with high HRU, contributing to higher costs in patients with mNSCLC treated with 1/2G EGFR-TKIs in 1L. EGFR-TKI treatments with better safety profiles may help alleviate this burden.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PCN48

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×