COMPARISON OF HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND COSTS FOR WALDENSTRÖM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA (WM) PATIENTS TREATED WITH IBRUTINIB OR CHEMOIMMUNOTHERAPY

Author(s)

Iyengar R1, Malangone-Monaco E2, Sugg C3, Arango-Hisijara I3, Chen Z3, DeYoung K2, Chan C2, Giafis N3
1Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Milpitas, CA, USA, 2IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Sunnyvale, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Compare all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between single-agent ibrutinib and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in patients with first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) WM in the US.

METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed (index) WM were identified using IBM MarketScan® claim databases between 12/31/2013 and 12/31/2017. Patients were required to have at least 6 months of continuous enrollment pre-index and no evidence of other primary malignancies, antineoplastic agents, or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation pre-index. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics as well as differences in mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) all-cause HRU and mean monthly cost difference (MMCD) between ibrutinib-treated and CIT-treated patients were examined by 1L and 2L in the follow-up period. Sensitivity analyses evaluating WM-specific HRU and costs were conducted.

RESULTS: 1L and 2L cohorts had 44 and 22 ibrutinib-treated, and 80 and 22 CIT-treated patients, respectively. Mean follow-up times were 703 days for ibrutinib-treated and 627 days for CIT-treated patients. Both cohorts had comparable baseline characteristics across lines. Ibrutinib-treated 1L patients had less than half the number of outpatient service visits (6.5 vs. 13.8, P<0.01), due to fewer outpatient services including antineoplastic-drug-administration–related visits (5.5 vs. 12.7, P<0.01), resulting in a net-monthly-outpatient-cost decrease of $7,424 (P<0.001) compared to CIT-treated patients. HRU and cost findings were similar in 2L. Fewer outpatient services (4.0 vs. 9.9, P<0.01) associated with ibrutinib, due to lower other outpatient services (3.5 vs. 9.0, P<0.01), had a corresponding significant decrease in outpatient costs of $4,264 (P<0.001) compared to CIT. Despite higher pharmacy costs, ibrutinib-treated patients had lower overall net-monthly-total-cost ($2,617 in 1L and $761 in 2L) compared to CIT-treated patients (statistically insignificant). WM-specific findings were similar across both lines.

CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib-treated patients had significantly lower all-cause and WM-specific outpatient healthcare resource utilization and costs compared to chemoimmunotherapy-treated patients in first- and second-line. FUNDING: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PCN108

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Prescribing Behavior, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Drugs, Oncology, Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×