IMPACT OF USING REAL-WORLD OUTCOMES DATA VERSUS CLINICAL EVIDENCE AND PUBLISHED PRICES IN VALUE ASSESSMENTS

Author(s)

Meade D, Hensley Alford S, Ng TH
IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To assess value, industry organizations often use published prices to calculate average prices per patient or price per QALY. However, this methodology requires numerous assumptions which need to be validated and can be challenging to ascertain. A better approach is to use fully-adjudicated realized prices and real-world clinical outcomes data for value assessments. We sought to demonstrate the impact on value analyses of using published vs. realized prices.

METHODS: Using the IBM Access and Value Connect solution, patients in the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Database between 1 October 2016 through 30 September 2017 with a psoriasis diagnosis were identified. To demonstrate an example of impact on value assessments, we calculated the mean per-patient-per-month (PPPM) cost associated with apremilast and compared that to the net price calculation reported in the 2018 Plaque Psoriasis Condition Update by ICER, based on per-unit dosing and discount assumptions.

RESULTS: We identified 4,169 patients with a psoriasis diagnosis during the study period. The adjudicated claims PPPM cost for US health plans was $20,821 with a mean duration of exposure to apremilast of 243 days and including concomitant psoriasis medications. This is approximately $10,000 less than the net price presented in the 2018 ICER report ($30,807 Year 1, $31,018 Year 2)[i]. Numerous additional differences between the real-world performance data and ICER evidence report were identified.

CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis found that using a fully-adjudicated realized price (1) allowed directcomparison of prices amongst therapies quickly and easily and (2) facilitated a more accurate reflection of price versus value when used alongside analysis of the real-world clinical outcomes data. We recommend that realized prices and real-world data be used for value assessments whenever possible. Value assessment organizations should incorporate the numerous data sets and tools available to improve transparency, accuracy and ease of analysis.

[i] https://icer-review.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ICER_Psoriasis_Update_Final_Evidence_Report_10042018.pdf

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PDG15

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Technology Assessment, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Modeling and simulation, Performance-based Outcomes, Value Frameworks & Dossier Format

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars, Drugs, Multiple Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×