Pre-Progression Health State Utility Values From the TALAPRO-2 Clinical Trial in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Unselected for DDR Mutations
Author(s)
Niyazov A1, Simou E2, Kirker M3, Houghton K4, Le Moine JG4, Chang J3, Yarr S4, Barnett C5, Mladsi DD6
1Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, LAN, Great Britain, 3Pfizer, New York, NY, USA, 4RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, LAN, UK, 5RTI Health Solutions, Durham, NC, USA, 6RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: TALAPRO-2, an international phase 3 trial (NCT03395197) comparing first-line (1L) treatment of adult patients with mCRPC unselected for DNA damage repair mutations (all comers) with talazoparib + enzalutamide (n=402) vs placebo + enzalutamide (n=403), showed a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) by blinded independent committee review (HR=0.627; 95% CI 0.506-0.777; P<0.0001). EQ-5D-5L was collected during the trial (baseline, every 4 weeks until week 53 or rPFS, every 8 weeks after week 53 until rPFS when no such progression had been documented, or every 12 weeks after progression until end of study). The aim of this research was to estimate pre-progression health-state utility values (HSUVs) suitable for use in cost-effectiveness analyses in 1L mCRPC.
METHODS: Data from all-comers in TALAPRO-2 were analyzed. Pre-progression HSUVs were estimated regardless of and by treatment arm using multivariate linear mixed effects regression analysis adjusted for covariates. Analyses employed value sets for US, UK, and Canada.
RESULTS: For US, mean (95% CI) pre-progression HSUV regardless of treatment arm was 0.847 (0.839-0.856). US treatment-specific pre-progression HSUVs for talazoparib + enzalutamide and placebo + enzalutamide were 0.851 (0.839-0.863) and 0.844 (0.831-0.856), respectively (difference not statistically significant, P=0.380). Consistent results were found for UK (regardless of treatment arm 0.827 (0.819-0.835); by treatment arm 0.831 (0.820-0.842) vs 0.823 (0.812-0.834); P=0.323) and Canada (regardless of treatment arm 0.858 (0.853-0.864); by treatment arm 0.861 (0.853-0.869) vs. 0.856 (0.847-0.864); P=0.376) for talazoparib + enzalutamide vs. placebo + enzalutamide, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis generated pre-progression HSUVs suitable for use in cost-effectiveness analyses in 1L mCRPC.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE507
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Health State Utilities
Disease
Oncology