Cost-Effectiveness of 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Filipino Adults Aged ≥50 Years
Author(s)
Santiaguel J1, Nua W2, Atwood M3, Huang L4, Hariharan D3, Guerrero J2, Zotomayor RC5, Averin A3
1UP-PGH Medical Center, Manila, Philippines, 2Pfizer Inc., Makati City, Philippines, 3Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Boston, MA, USA, 4Pfizer Inc., Washington Crossing, PA, USA, 5UERMMMC Inc.; SLMC, Quezon City, Philippines
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
The Philippines national immunization program (NIP) included the use of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) for adults ≥60 years. Additionally, the local clinical practice guidelines recommended to use 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) or PPV23 in adults aged ≥50 years who are at elevated risk of pneumococcal disease due to chronic medical or immunocompromising conditions. To assess the economic implications of PCV13 use versus PPV23 (with revaccination 5 years later), we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in adults aged 50-59 years with elevated risk and all adults aged ≥60 years.METHODS:
A probabilistic cohort model was developed to project the lifetime risks and costs of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), all-cause non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (NBPP), and expected impact of vaccination. Clinical outcomes were projected on an annual basis based on current epidemiology and age/risk profile. Economic costs were estimated based on cases and corresponding medical, non-medical and vaccination costs. Costs and benefits were discounted at a rate of 7%/year. Cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was evaluated from the healthcare system and societal perspectives.RESULTS:
Compared with 2 doses of PPSV23 (revaccination 5 years later), one-dose of PCV13 was estimated to reduce additional IPD cases by 832, NBPP cases by 1,093, and deaths by 376 among adults aged 50-59 with elevated risk and all adults aged ≥60 years (N=12.8 million). From the healthcare perspective (considering medical and vaccination costs only), net costs were estimated to be ₱33.6 million yielding a cost/QALY of ₱31,791; from the societal perspective (including non-medical costs), the cost/QALY was estimated to be ₱25,308.CONCLUSIONS:
CEA suggests that, compared with the current recommendation, using one dose of PCV13 in adults aged 50-59 years with elevated risk and all adults aged ≥60 years in the Philippines would be cost-effective based on one time GDP per capita threshold.Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE592
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory), Vaccines