Switching to TNFi Versus Non-TNFi Biologics in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: Real-World Outcomes from a German Claims Data Analysis

Author(s)

Zhuleku E1, Wirth D2, Nissinen R3, Passey A4, Bravatà I5, Ziavra D6, Duva A7, Lee J8, Maywald U9, Wilke T10, Bokemeyer B11
1Cytel, Berlin, BE, Germany, 2Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 3Janssen-Cilag Oy, Espoo, Uusimaa, Finland, 4Janssen-Cilag UK, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK, 5Janssen-Cilag S.P.A, Milan, Italy, 6Janssen-Cilag S.A.C.I, Pefki, Greece, 7Janssen-Cilag Ltd, High Wycombe, UK, 8Janssen-Cilag A/S, Birkerod, Rudersdal, Denmark, 9AOK PLUS, Dresden, Germany, 10IPAM e.V., Wismar, Germany, 1110. Interdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre Minden, Minden, Germany

OBJECTIVES: Treatment failure remains challenging in clinical practice among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving biologics. With limited real-world data on preferential sequencing, we evaluated outcomes of patients switching to another tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi biologic therapy following failure on first-line (1L) TNFis.

METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 confirmed outpatient UC diagnoses (ICD-10: K51.-) and no subsequent Crohn’s disease diagnosis (ICD-10: K50.-) between 01/05/2014 and 30/06/2021 were identified from the German AOK PLUS administrative claims dataset, covering >3.4 million insured individuals. Bio-naïve patients initiating TNFis (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab) in the inclusion period and switching to another biologic were selected. Patients were classified as within-class switchers (WCS) if they switched to a different TNFi or outside-class (OCS) if they switched to a biologic with an alternative mode of action (vedolizumab, ustekinumab; index = date of switch). Patients were followed from index to earliest of death, insurance end, or study end (30/06/2022). Cox regression models weighted using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were utilized, comparing time to discontinuation, second switch, and prolonged corticosteroid therapy (3 prescriptions within 12 months).

RESULTS: Overall, 166 patients initiating TNFis and switching to another biologic were identified (mean 42.9 years, 49.4% female, mean 3.4 years follow-up). After IPTW, there were 71 and 76 patients in the WCS and OCS group, respectively. WCS were significantly more likely to discontinue therapy (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.14-2.89, p=0.012) and switch to a third therapy (HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.89-6.36, p<0.001). While WCS showed an increased likelihood to initiate prolonged corticosteroid therapy (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.77-2.59, p=0.260), results were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that following 1L TNFi failure, patients with UC exhibit more favourable outcomes when switching outside-class to a non-TNFi advanced therapy compared to a different TNFi.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

RWD113

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Biologics & Biosimilars, Drugs, Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×