The Budget Impact of Introducing Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Spinal Fusion Procedures in Spain

Author(s)

Álvarez-Sala F1, Rodríguez Moro C1, Garcia Cañas R1, Bernácer López JL1, Zahra M2, Álvarez M3, Monje J4
1Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 2Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland, 3Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., Madrid, M, Spain, 4Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., Durango, BI, Spain

OBJECTIVES: Robotic surgery provides several advantages, such as enhanced reproducibility and predictability through accurate execution of the preoperative plan but it is also associated with a higher capital investment which limits its widespread use. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the economic impact of introducing robotic-assisted surgery for spinal fusion procedures regardless of the indication from a Spanish, tertiary hospital perspective considering a 10-year time horizon.

METHODS: A cost analysis was developed based on previously published meta-analysis and a randomized clinical trial to assess the budget impact associated with replacing on a 1:1 basis conventional freehand surgery with robotic assisted surgery. Unit costs, obtained from different Spanish sources and expressed in €2023, were applied to health resource consumption comprising equipment, consumables, maintenance, surgical procedure, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative screw revisions and blood transfusions. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS: For each treatment group, 300 procedures were considered annually over 10 years. Estimated mean total costs per patient undergoing robotic-assisted spine surgery or conventional freehand surgery were €13,650 and €13,922, respectively, resulting in mean total cost savings of €272 per patient. The acquisition cost of the robotic guidance system was outweighed by the cost savings associated with potential shorter length of stay, reduced need for revision procedures and blood transfusions, which resulted in a cost decrease per patient of €1,611, €372, and €58, respectively. These savings allowed a return on the capital investment from the sixth year following the intervention. As per the sensitivity analysis, the results were more sensitive to change in the hospitalization unit cost.

CONCLUSIONS: From a Spanish hospital perspective, upfront costs of performing robotic assisted spinal surgery for spinal fusion in comparison with conventional freehand surgery were estimated to be totally offset after the sixth year of investment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE588

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Medical Devices

Disease

Injury & Trauma, Medical Devices, Surgery

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×