Uncertainty Around HRQoL Values Is Under-Reported: Are We Misleading Decision Makers?

Author(s)

Devlin N1, Abangma G2, Parkin D3, Lloyd A4, Briggs A2
1The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK, 3City University of London, London, UK, 4Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

OBJECTIVES: To (a) provide a comprehensive account of the various sources of uncertainty affecting HRQoL 'value sets'; (b) identify methods which have been explored to account for uncertainty, and (c) highlight gaps in methods and reporting, and their implications for associated analyses such as the estimation of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) used in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA).

METHODS: Uncertainty affecting HRQoL values were classified by source (e.g. sampling, study design, stated preference methods, analysis and modelling value sets). We describe how values combine with health state descriptions to create uncertainty in QALY estimates. A scoping review was undertaken to establish what methods have been developed to handle uncertainty around HRQoL value sets. We identify a standard method for calculating standard errors for predicted values that is rarely applied to the statistical models used to identify the value sets for instruments.

RESULTS: Many factors drive uncertainty in HRQoL values, including choices about stated preference methods and study design, sampling procedures, respondent and interviewer effects, and approaches taken to modelling values. Just nine studies were identified that attempt to quantify uncertainty around modelled HRQoL value sets; all focus on statistical uncertainty around estimated parameters.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite 50 years of research on HRQoL valuation, the associated uncertainty around values has been largely ignored and remains under-reported. This conveys a false sense of precision around the values reported for instruments such as EQ-5D, and means that uncertainty is not adequately taken into account in QALY calculations and CEA. Few papers report methods for addressing uncertainty around HRQoL value sets; these tend to focus specifically on statistical uncertainty arising from modelling. Many of the other sources of uncertainty we identified remain under-explored. We present one method for reporting standard errors around modelled health state values, using information readily generated for existing value sets, that should become standard practice.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE449

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Health State Utilities, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×