Projecting the Potential Impact of Disease Modifying Therapy on the Future Health and Social Costs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Author(s)
Trepel D1, Edwards S2, Ritchie C3, Hahn-Pedersen JH4, Kettle J5, Chan MS5, Bray BD5, Clark A4, Ivkovic M6, Wichmann CA4, Evans LM7
1Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, UK, 2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, Denmark, 3Scottish Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, 4Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Søborg, Denmark, 5Health Analytics, Lane Clark & Peacock LLP, London, UK, 6Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark, 7University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: We modelled scenarios exploring a range of future potential impacts on health and social care costs in the United Kingdom of disease modifying treatments (DMT) for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
METHODS: A cohort Markov model was developed to predict the distribution of the UK population by five AD stages (from cognitively unimpaired to severe AD dementia) from 2020–2040, using national population projections and literature on AD prevalence and transition rates between AD stages. Published health and social care costs for each AD stage, supplemented by cost data from AD dementia patients in Northwest London (the Discover cohort), was applied to estimate direct health and social care costs. Parameter estimates on likely treatment rates and future care models (primary care vs specialty care follow up) were elicited from expert opinion. What-if scenarios for DMT access combining ranges of potential DMT efficacy estimates and access levels were modelled.
RESULTS: In the absence of DMT access, ~1 million people (1.5% prevalence) were projected to have AD dementia in the UK by 2040. Across the DMT access scenarios, cumulative health and social care cost savings of £4.4–12.9bn over 2020–2040 were estimated, based on projected reductions of 34k–98k people with AD dementia by 2040 (for restricted-access, medium-efficacy to high-access, high-efficacy scenarios respectively). The maximal cost savings of £12.9bn corresponded to £1.9bn annual savings. In medium-efficacy scenarios, moving from restricted-access to high-access doubled cumulative cost savings (£4.4bn to £10.1bn by 2040), demonstrating a potential high cost impact of improved access to DMT. Much larger cost savings under majority primary vs specialty care follow up (£10.1bn vs £0.4bn by 2040) were projected.
CONCLUSIONS: These results corroborate with previously published projections for AD and indicate high access levels to DMTs could substantially reduce the economic burden of AD on health and social care systems.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
MSR71
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Neurological Disorders, No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas