The Development of a Comprehensive Archive of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) for Clinical Research and Clinical Practice in Oncology
Author(s)
Malandrini FB1, Meregaglia M1, Pinto C2, Di Maio M3, Ciani O1
1SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milano, MI, Italy, 2Department of Medical Oncology, S. Maria Hospital - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 3University of Turin, Torino, TO, Italy
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Choosing the most adequate measure of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials, clinical practice, and post-authorization studies is not straightforward. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive archive of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology and identify their main characteristics and target outcome domains.
METHODS: As part of the PRO4All project, we retrieved the available PROMs in oncology by searching facit.org, eortc.org, eprovide.mapi-trust.org, ema.europa.eu (European Public Assessment Reports), and published reviews. We developed a data extraction form to collect information on: PROM name, cancer area (based on ICD-10), type of questionnaire (i.e., self-reported, proxy-reported or caregiver’s report), questionnaire variant(s), recall period (e.g., last week) and number of items. Moreover, we assigned each item a specific domain according to a predefined 38-item taxonomy for outcome classification.
RESULTS: A total of 308 PROMs were identified and fully analyzed. Over half (n=156, 50.6%) were cancer type-specific (e.g., breast cancer n=27, 8.8%), 132 (42.9%) were generic for cancer and 20 (6.5%) were intended for the general population but also recommended or used for cancer patients. 48 (15.6%) were variants of another questionnaire. The great majority of questionnaires (93.2%) were self-reported, 3.2% were proxy-reported (e.g., by parents), and 3.6% were related to caregiver’s status. In almost half of the cases (47.1%) the recall period was last week. The mean number of items per questionnaire was 22.5 (range: 1- 130). In total, 6921 items were assigned an outcome domain, which was emotional functioning/wellbeing in 21.5% of cases, physical functioning in 15.0%, general outcomes in 9.9% and delivery of care in 9.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: This review study highlighted a significant heterogeneity of PROMs in oncology. The newly developed archive represents a useful tool for guiding researchers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable measures for cancer patients and fostering a patient-centered approach.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
PCR17
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology