Cost Effectiveness of Romosozumab Followed by Alendronate Versus Teriparatide in the Treatment of Severe Osteoporosis in Greece

Author(s)

Golnas P1, Relakis J2, Kountouris V2, Golna C1, Makras P3, Willems D4, Souliotis K5
1Health Policy Institute, Maroussi, Attika, Greece, 2UCB Pharma, Athens, Attika, Greece, 3251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, Athens, Attika, Greece, 4UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 5University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Peloponnese, Greece

OBJECTIVES: Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody for osteoporosis treatment, inhibits sclerostin, increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. We evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness of treatment with romosozumab for 12 months (mo) followed by alendronate for 12 mo compared with teriparatide for 24 mo in patients with severe osteoporosis [T-score <-2.5 and fragility fracture(s)] in Greece.

METHODS: A Markov model developed in Microsoft Excel was localized to the Greek setting from the third-party payer (EOPYY) perspective. Clinical inputs were derived from the ARCH trial, a systematic literature review, and a network meta-analysis. Cost inputs were obtained from Greek public sources. The model included five health states: at risk of fracture, hip fracture, vertebral fracture, non-hip-non-vertebral fracture, and dead. All patients entered the model in the at risk of fracture state and were followed for a lifetime horizon to account for short and long-term cost and health effect consequences. Both quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY) and costs were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of costs per QALY gained, in 2023 Euros (€).

RESULTS: Compared with teriparatide, romosozumab followed by alendronate yielded 0.054 additional QALYs and 0.015 additional life-years. Number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one hip fracture in a lifetime horizon was 31 for romosozumab + alendronate versus 86 for teriparatide. Fracture-related medical costs were lower in the romosozumab + alendronate arm (-€298). Total incremental cost was €1,956 and cost per QALY was €36,222, which is below the perceived willingness-to-pay threshold of approximately 3 times the per capita GDP of Greece (€51,219). Model robustness and base case assumptions were validated with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: According to our analysis, treatment with romosozumab (12 mo) followed by alendronate (12 mo) was cost-effective compared to teriparatide (24mo) in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Greece.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE41

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×