Health Economic Evaluation Incorporating Mixture Cure Survival Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Previously Untreated Metastatic NSCLC

Author(s)

Griffiths A1, Young R1, Yuan Y2, Chaudhary M2, Lee A3, Gordon J1, McEwan P4
1Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, LON, UK, 4Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, CRF, Great Britain

OBJECTIVES:

This study describes the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) versus platinum doublet chemotherapy (Chemo) in previously untreated metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using ‘mixture cure’ survival analysis, a statistical method to address circumstances where some patients experience long-term survival and negligible excess mortality.

METHODS:

A semi-Markov model was developed in Microsoft Excel from a US third-party payer perspective based on CheckMate 227 data (3 year database lock [DBL]); model selection was informed by 5 year DBL. The model consisted of four health states: progression-free, post-progression, progression-free with long-term response (LTR), and dead. A mixture cure survival modelling approach was used to explore long-term survival trends, with LTR patients exposed to general population mortality hazard. US-specific costs (2021 dollars) were derived from publicly available sources, utilities were informed by CheckMate 227 patient reported outcomes. Model outcomes included the incremental cost per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for NIVO+IPI versus Chemo based on a lifetime time horizon; uncertainty was evaluated in probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).

RESULTS:

NIVO+IPI was associated with a mean gain of 1.69 LYs and 1.43 QALYs versus Chemo using a mixture-cure model of overall survival. 3.97 LYs were accrued on NIVO+IPI, of which 2.01 were in the LTR state. The incremental cost of NIVO+IPI versus Chemo was $134,792, with an incremental cost per QALY of $93,982; the 95% confidence interval in PSA was $129,705 - $157,079 for incremental costs and 0.86 – 2.04 for incremental QALYS.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results indicate that compared with Chemo, NIVO+IPI is a cost-effective first-line treatment at established norms for cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of NIVO+IPI was associated with a significant LTR fraction and gain in QALYs using a mixture-cure modelling framework. PSA supported the robustness of these conclusions. Further research based on future DBL is indicated to confirm these findings.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE513

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

STA: Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×