Clinical Differences and Patient Reported Outcomes Between Insufficient Responders and Responders to Prescribed Acute Migraine Treatment: Results From a Real-World Patient Survey in China

Author(s)

Novick D1, Zhang L2, Zhong S3, Li J3, Walker C4, Harrison L4, Jackson J4
1Eli Lilly and Company, Bracknell, SRY, UK, 2Eli Lilly China, Shanghai, 31, China, 3Eli Lilly China, Shanghai, China, 4Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between insufficient response to prescribed acute migraine treatment and headache-related patient disability and work productivity, and identify clinical differences between these patients and those achieving optimal response to acute treatment.

METHODS: Data were collected in China from January to June 2014 as part of the Adelphi Migraine Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey. Internists/neurologists provided patient record forms and clinical data for nine consecutively consulting patients with migraine. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, which included the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaires. Patients defined as treatment insufficient responders (TIRs) reported pain freedom within 2 hours of taking their acute treatment in ≤3/5 migraine attacks; treatment responders (TRs) reported pain freedom within 2 hours in ≥4/5 attacks. T-tests and Fisher’s exact tests were performed.

RESULTS: The analysis included 777 patients prescribed acute migraine treatment (TIRs n=342, 44%; TRs n=435, 56%). TIRs experienced fewer migraine days per month, on average, compared to TRs (2.8 vs 3.1; p<0.05). TIRs were more likely to be diagnosed with migraine with aura (24% vs. 13% for TIRs vs. TRs, respectively; p<0.05), and experience unilateral pain (80% vs. 73%; p<0.05), sensitivity to smell (18% vs. 9%; p<0.05), and visual aura/sight disturbance (13% vs. 8%; p<0.05). TIRs had a significantly higher overall MIDAS score (6.6 vs 5.5; p<0.05), indicating greater disability. Compared with TR, TIRs experienced greater work productivity and activity impairment (presenteeism impairment, 64% vs. 50% for TIRs vs. TRs; overall work impairment, 66% vs. 53%; overall activity impairment, 59% vs. 49%; all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Headache-related patient disability and work productivity were significantly impacted in TIRs versus TRs in this real-world analysis of patients with migraine in China, indicating a need for more effective acute treatments for patients experiencing insufficient response.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

RWD105

Topic

Patient-Centered Research, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Data Protection, Integrity, & Quality Assurance, Distributed Data & Research Networks, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

SDC: Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×