The Cost-Effectiveness of Brentuximab Vedotin in Frontline Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma in France

Author(s)

Chaker O1, Nucit A2, Salvignol O3, Thoren AC3, Cranmer H4, Coulibaly C3, Chevalier J1, Borget I5
1VYOO Agency, Paris, 75, France, 2Takeda France, Paris, France, 3Takeda France, Paris, 75, France, 4Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., London, UK, 5Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France; Oncostat; GRADES, Paris-Saclay University, Châtenay-Malabry, France U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, “Ligue Contre le Cancer” labeled team, Chatenay-Malabry, 92, France

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES

Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one of the subtypes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (CHP) chemotherapy versus current chemotherapies in France.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis was developed using a three-state partitioned survival model (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, death) over a lifetime (35-year) horizon to compare BV+CHP to chemotherapies from a collective perspective. The simulated population and the clinical effectiveness for BV+CHP were based on the pivotal clinical trial ECHELON-2 results. The main comparator included in this analysis was cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone (CHOEP) chemotherapy with relative efficacy/effectiveness and safety data derived from a network meta-analysis. Costs were measured in 2020 euros and effects measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). These were evaluated with a discount rate of 2.5% and 1.5% per annum before and after 30-years, respectively, according to French guidelines. Uncertainty associated to methodological assumptions and model parameters was addressed through scenario analyses and deterministic/probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, the regimen of BV+CHP versus CHOEP was associated with 3.6 QALYs gained at a total incremental cost of 43 844€, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of approximately 12 211€. According to overall survival extrapolation, BV+CHP was associated with an extension of 4.4 life years. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses generated a 95%CI of [0€ ; 40 900€] and an 80% probability of being cost-effective based on a willingness to pay (WTP) of 19 000€/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of BV+CHP is estimated to improve life expectancy by 4.4 years over a lifetime horizon and is likely to be cost-effective in France, with an ICER of 12 211€, based on conventional WTP threshold in patients suffering from sALCL.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSC49

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×