Long-Term Evolution of Hospital Resource Utilization and Associated Costs Using Adjustment Methods in Patients Treated with Nivolumab for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Author(s)

Grumberg V1, Chouaid C2, Cotte FE3, Jouaneton B4, Jolivel R4, Gaudin AF3, Reynaud D3, Assie JB5, Borget I6
1Oncostat - U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, “Ligue Contre le Cancer” labeled team, Paris, France, 2Department of Chest Medicine, Créteil University Hospital, Créteil, France, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 4HEVA, Lyon, France, 5INSERM U1138 Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (CRC), Paris, France, 6Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France; Oncostat; GRADES, Paris-Saclay University, Châtenay-Malabry, France U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, “Ligue Contre le Cancer” labeled team, Chatenay-Malabry, 92, France

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

Few studies explore healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and their associated costs during the full course of disease. In advanced cancers, HCRU and costs usually increase until end of life. The objective was to describe the evolution of HCRU and costs over 4 years of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) initiating nivolumab in ≥2nd line.

METHODS:

Based on the French hospitals reimbursement database, all aNSCLC patients initiating nivolumab in 2nd line or later in 2015 or 2016 were followed until 2019. HCRU (including hospitalizations and hospital visits) and costs (payor perspective) were described annually after nivolumab initiation and adjusted for the 4th year using percentage difference between 2-years extraction. Trends in HCRU were analyzed with the Mann-Kendall test. As most patients did not reach a 4-years follow-up, cost-analysis was performed with 3 methods for censored cost data: 1) without adjustment on all patients, 2) without adjustment in uncensored cases only and 3) with the Bang&Tsiatis method on all patients.

RESULTS:

10,452 patients initiated nivolumab in 2015-16. The mean number of hospital visits per patient diminished over time (p<0.001): 23.3 Year 1 (Y1; n=10,452), 21.3 Year 2 (Y2; n=4645), 19.7 Year 3 (Y3; n=2640), 13.2 Year 4 without adjustment and 18.3 with adjustment (Y4, n=1630). Overall hospitalization duration per patient (days) decreased over time (p<0.001): 36.0 (Y1), 29.4 (Y2), 25.2 (Y3) and 14.9 (Y4-unadjusted) and 20.5 (Y4-adjusted). Whatever the adjustment method, annual cost per patient tended to decrease. The method without adjustment provided the lowest cost over time (€44,404 (Y1), €32,206 (Y2); €28,552 (Y3); €18,841(Y4)) while the Bang&Tsiatis method presented the highest (€45,002 (Y1), €36,330 (Y2); €35,080 (Y3); €28,931 (Y4)).

CONCLUSIONS:

HCRU and costs of NSCLC patients treated by nivolumab decreased over time. This study allowed exploration of the uncertainty in the estimation of HCRU and costs due to censored follow-up data.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSC418

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Health & Insurance Records Systems

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×