Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Empagliflozin Versus Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFREF)
Author(s)
Smith S1, Pilkington H2, Roskell N3, Linden S4, Bellanca L5
1BresMed Health Solutions Ltd., Sheffield, LAN, UK, 2BresMed Health Solutions Ltd., Harrogate, UK, 3BresMed Health Solutions Ltd., Sheffield, UK, 4Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany, 5Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd., Brecknell, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This research investigated the relative efficacy, using indirect treatment comparison (ITC) methodology, of empagliflozin with that of sacubitril/valsartan among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Empagliflozin + standard of care (SoC) and sacubitril/valsartan + SoC were investigated in separate, Phase 3, randomized controlled trials (EMPEROR-REDUCED and PARADIGM-HF, respectively). METHODS: In the absence of direct evidence, ITCs were conducted to estimate the relative efficacy of empagliflozin with sacubitril/valsartan. It was assumed that the placebo + SoC arm in EMPEROR-REDUCED was comparable to the enalapril + SoC arm in PARADIGM-HF. Bucher ITC methodology used this common comparator arm. The primary endpoint (time to first event of adjudicated cardiovascular [CV] death or adjudicated hospitalization for heart failure [HHF]) was compared. Time to adjudicated CV death and time to adjudicated HHF were also analyzed individually, alongside a further time to event endpoint: time to all-cause mortality. Subgroup analyses and anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were performed as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: For the composite primary endpoint, both empagliflozin and sacubitril/valsartan showed significant and similar improvements over placebo. The Bucher ITC based hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for this endpoint comparing empagliflozin with sacubitril/valsartan was 0.94 (0.79, 1.11). Overall, results suggested similar efficacy between empagliflozin and sacubitril/valsartan. The Bucher ITC HRs (95% CI) for time to adjudicated HHF, time to adjudicated CV death, and time to all-cause mortality were 0.87 (0.72, 1.06), 1.15 (0.91, 1.45) and 1.10 (0.89, 1.34), respectively. The sensitivity analyses produced results consistent with the Bucher ITCs. CONCLUSIONS: This indirect comparison suggests patients with HFrEF who are treated with empagliflozin have similar efficacy across key outcomes in heart failure compared with sacubitril/valsartan treated patients.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSB22
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders, Drugs