A Retrospective Study of the Management of Anaemia in Patients with Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease in France: The Amack Study
Author(s)
Choukroun G1, Courivaud C2, Rostoker G3, Zaoui P4, Menoyo V5, Harmand S6, Dubel L7, Lorenzo MM8
1CHU Amiens, Somme, France, 2CHU Besançon, Doubs, France, 3Hôpital Privé Claude Galien, Essonne, France, 4AGDUC, Isère, France, 5Association ECHO, Loire-Atlantique, France, 6IQVIA, Hauts-de-Seine, France, 7Astellas Pharma, Hauts-de-Seine, France, 8Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK
OBJECTIVES : Anaemia, a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), is associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to describe current routine anaemia management in dialysis-dependent (DD) CKD patients in France. METHODS : This longitudinal, observational study included retrospective electronic medical records (the MEDIAL database) for DD-CKD patients aged ≥18 years managed in French hospitals, 01/01/2016–31/12/2016 (inclusion period). The ‘CKD anaemia’ cohort comprised DD-CKD patients with at least one anaemic marker (haemoglobin <13 g/dL for males, <12 g/dL for females; record of any anaemia treatment; and/or anaemia diagnosis [ICD10 code D63.8]). Index date (ID) was the date of first anaemic marker during the inclusion period. One-year patient medical history prior to ID and ≤2-year follow-up data were collected. The primary objective was to describe treatment (erythropoiesis-stimulating agents [ESAs], oral/IV iron) of CKD-related anaemia. RESULTS : Of 1729 DD-CKD patients in the database, 1632 were eligible for inclusion; of these, 1286 (78.8%) had anaemia. Mean (SD) age was 70.4 (14.6) years. At ID, 83.1% (1069/1286) of the CKD anaemia cohort received ESAs, 77.4% (995/1286) IV iron, 0.2% (2/1286) oral iron, and 4.6% (59/1286) no treatment. The most frequent treatment combinations were IV iron + ESA (65.1%, 837/1286) and ESA only (18.0%, 231/1286). During 2 years’ follow-up, 55.9% (719/1286) had ≥1 treatment change (37.4% [313/837] in the IV iron + ESA group; 96.1% [222/231] in the ESA only group); of these, most (85.8%, 617/719) had only one treatment change. Among first treatment changes, almost all were either add-ons (49.4%, 355/719) or stopping treatment (50.3%, 362/719). Only 0.3% (2/719) switched treatments. Treatments added were split between ESAs (40.6%, 144/355) and iron (59.4%, 211/355). Among discontinued treatments, most were ESAs (83.1%, 301/362). CONCLUSIONS : In France, IV iron + ESA was the predominant treatment regimen for DD-CKD-related anaemia. Under current care standards, significant unmet needs remain.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSB241
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Hospital and Clinical Practices, Prescribing Behavior, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Urinary/Kidney Disorders