Cost-Utility of Ribociclib As the First-Line Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Negative in Colombia

Author(s)

Díaz-Ortega M1, Gamboa O2, Herrera D3, Barbosa D3, Montenegro E3
1NOVARTIS, Oncology Business Unit, Bogotá, CUN, Colombia, 2SIIES, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, 3NOVARTIS, Oncology Business Unit, Bogotá, D.C., CUN, Colombia

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-utility of ribociclib as the first-line treatment in postmenopausal women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer, Hormone Receptor positive (HR+) and HER2-, from the perspective of the Colombian health system.

METHODS: A partitioned survival model was built with pre-progression, post-progression and death health states, according to the areas under the curve for the survival functions, with a 40-year time horizon. Direct medical costs for medicines and their administration, monitoring, handling of adverse events and terminal care were included; a local expert validated resource usage. The sources of costs were price control circulars, SISMED, ISS and SOAT tariff manuals, and the database of sufficiency (values in USD 2021: 1 USD = 3,770.9 COP). The probabilities of the events were based on a systematic review and the hazard ratios of survival were estimated with an indirect comparison meta-analysis. Health utility values were extracted from the literature. A 5% discount rate was applied for outcomes and costs. Health effects were valued as Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Cost-effectiveness was analyzed against a range of willingness to pay thresholds in a probabilistic sensitivity analysis type acceptability curve.

RESULTS: In the base case, average values per patient are: USD$ 22,919.90/2.92 QALY for fulvestrant, USD$ 79,385.04/3.17 QALY for ribociclib+letrozole, USD$ 84,735.61/3.17 QALY for palbociclib+letrozole and USD$ 110,699.86/3.47 QALY for ribociclib+fulvestrant. Ribociclib+letrozole is a dominant alternative to palbociclib+letrozole and between a willingness to pay of USD$ 0.0-84,064 is the alternative with the highest probability of cost-effectiveness. Ribociclib+fulvestrant has the greater effectiveness among all alternatives and has extended dominance over ribociclib+letrozole; however, its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio exceeds the three times gross domestic product per capita threshold (USD$ 16,728.36).

CONCLUSIONS: Ribociclib+letrozole is a cost-effective and cost-saving alternative to the Colombian health system, as a first-line treatment in postmenopausal women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer, HR+ and HER2-.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSA116

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×