A Review of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) Public Summary Documents to Investigate the Use of Child-Specific Utility Measures in Decision Making in Australia
Author(s)
Bailey C1, Dalziel K2, Cronin P3, Devlin N4, Viney R5
1University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia, 2The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 4University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 5University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
OBJECTIVES : Methods for valuing health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) are accepted for use in the general population but use of these methods is more challenging in children (aged under eighteen). In this study, we investigated the use of HRQoL measures for medicines used by children by reviewing Public Summary Documents released by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), where a cost-utility analysis was performed. METHODS : We systematically searched the PBAC Public Summary Documents for medicines used in children for the management of childhood diseases using a comprehensive framing list. Medicines from our sample frame where Public Summary Documents were available were searched for whether children were mentioned, and whether utilities, QALYs or a cost-utility analysis were used. Most medicines had multiple documents representing multiple submissions. Where documents met these inclusion criteria, we extracted relevant data. RESULTS : From a sample of 1889 available Public Summary Documents, we found that 62 documents, (29 medicines) met the inclusion criteria (referred to children and used utility values). Four of these documents (2 medicines) included child-specific HRQoL measures (the Health Utility Index Mark 2). Sixteen documents (8 medicines) used adult-specific HRQoL, most of which were the EuroQol-5D. In 11 documents (8 medicines), direct elicitation was used; predominantly the time trade-off method. In 31 documents (16 medicines), it was not possible to determine the source of the utilities. We then investigated whether the use of child-specific HRQOL measures may have reduced decision-making uncertainty. We found that in 85% of medicines in our sample (where child-specific utilities had not been used) decision-making uncertainty may have been reduced through the use of child-specific utilities. CONCLUSIONS : Child-specific utilities are not frequently used in decision-making for the subsidization of medicines used by children in Australia, but increased use may reduce decision-making uncertainty.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSA301
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory
Topic Subcategory
Public Spending & National Health Expenditures
Disease
No Specific Disease