Cost-Effectiveness of Triple Therapy with Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Versus Dual Therapies in Moderate-to-Very Severe COPD: United Kingdom Analysis Using the ETHOS Study
Author(s)
de Nigris E1, Treharne C2, Brighton N2, Holmgren U3, Jenkins M4, Walker A5, Haughney J6
1Formerly of AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK, 2Parexel International, London, UK, 3AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden, 4AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK, 5Salus Alba, Glasgow, UK, 6Clinical Research Facility, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
OBJECTIVES: The 52-week ETHOS study (NCT02465567) showed that fixed-dose triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate 320/14.4/10 µg (BGF 320) reduced moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations versus fixed-dose long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA dual therapy (Rabe et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:35–48). Here, ETHOS data are used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of BGF 320 versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA dual therapies in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Incurred costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD were extrapolated using a Markov model, which considered progression in severity (lung function decline), occurrence of moderate and severe exacerbations, adverse events, and discontinuations from the ETHOS study for BGF 320, the LAMA/LABA glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate 14.4/10 µg (GFF), and the ICS/LABA budesonide/formoterol fumarate 320/10 µg (BFF). Healthcare resource utilization was based on ETHOS data; unit costs came from UK National Health Service reference costs, the Personal Social Services Research Unit manual and the published literature. EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level utilities for COPD severity states were estimated from ETHOS; exacerbation disutilities were sourced from a systematic literature review. A lifetime horizon was considered. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5% per annum. RESULTS: For BGF 320 versus GFF and BFF, respectively, incremental costs were £3136 and £1066, incremental QALYs were 0.23 and 0.49, and incremental exacerbation reductions were –2.45 and –1.86. The incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were £13,700 and £2164 per QALY gained versus GFF and BFF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on ETHOS data, BGF 320 is cost-effective versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA dual therapy at the conventional UK-adopted willingness to pay (ICUR< £20,000 per QALY). The main cost-effectiveness driver was the reduction in exacerbation rate, which reduced costs and preserved quality of life, for BGF 320 versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSA67
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Drugs, Respiratory-Related Disorders