Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diagnostic and Screening Strategies: When and How to Compare a Googolplex of Strategies?
Author(s)
Discussion Leader: Martin Henriksson, PhD, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Discussants: Rita Faria, MSc, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK; Mattias Aronsson, PhD, AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden; Erik Koffijberg, PhD, MSc, Health Technology & Services Research, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, OV, Netherlands
Presentation Documents
PURPOSE: Cost-effectiveness modelling of diagnostic and screening strategies enables the comparison of multiple test- and treat strategies well beyond the number of comparators in a clinical study.
The flipside is that often hundreds, thousands, or a googolplex of strategies can be formulated. Comparing them all may be infeasible, inefficient, and the results difficult to interpret and communicate. As cost-effectiveness modelling is increasingly used to evaluate diagnostic/screening tests, inform guidelines and national policy, addressing this challenge is essential. We will present approaches to the cost-effectiveness analysis of many diagnostic strategies and discuss with the audience how best to handle their complexity.DESCRIPTION: Martin Henriksson will introduce the challenges and policy implications, followed by case studies providing food for thought:
- Cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia, where strategies were selected according to their probability of being cost-effective (Rita Faria).
- From two billion to seven strategies in screening for atrial fibrillation, modelling outcomes for all potential strategies, systematically narrowing down to a few potentially cost-effective ones (Mattias Aronsson).
- Metamodeling using an existing simulation model, to exhaustively evaluate all potential screening strategies for colorectal cancer (Erik Koffijberg).
- How to present the results of 100s of strategies?
- Can we determine beforehand or during evaluation which (further) strategies might be interesting to evaluate (and ignore the rest)?
- How can metamodeling support evaluation of many strategies?
Conference/Value in Health Info
Code
309
Topic
Study Approaches