Treatment Outcomes Affect Direct and Indirect Costs in Patients with Treatment Resistant Depression in European Standard Clinical Practice

Author(s)

Morrens J1, Heerlein K2, Gonzalez Martin Moro B3, Barbreau S4, Rive B4, Diels J5, Malynn S6
1Janssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium, 2Janssen EMEA, Neuss, Germany, 3Janssen EMEA, Madrid, Spain, 4Janssen EMEA, Paris, France, 5Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium, 6Janssen EMEA, Dublin, Ireland

OBJECTIVES

Treatment resistant depression (TRD), defined by failure to respond to ≥2 different antidepressants in the same major depressive episode (MDE), comes with considerable direct and indirect costs.1 Despite significant economic burden, few studies report healthcare resource utilization of TRD patients in routine practice.1 This study examined treatment outcomes and medical resource use of TRD patients in Europe.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted in adult TRD patients with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥20 and initiating a new antidepressive treatment. Patient characteristics, treatment outcomes and medical resource utilization were collected from medical records, clinician-rated interviews and patient-reported questionnaires. Response and remission were defined as ≥50% reduction in MADRS from baseline and MADRS ≤10 respectively.

RESULTS

After six months, 81/306 (26.5%) patients reached response while 51/306 (16.7%) achieved remission. The average Sheehan Disability Scale score was 6.2 in remitters, 16.8 in responders and 20.0 in non-responders. While 5.9% of remitters, 8.6% of responders and 8.6% of non-responders were hospitalized between baseline and month 6, the average length of stay in days was higher in non-responders (20.3) compared to responders (13.3) and remitters (8.7). Additionally, fewer remitters and responders had ICU visits compared to non-responders (3.9%; 4.9%; 7.2% respectively). Finally, remitters and responders were less likely to have outpatient consultations (psychiatrist, psychologist, general practitioner, etc.) compared to non-responders (49.0% vs 53.5% vs 57.5% respectively) and their number of outpatient consultations was also generally lower.

CONCLUSIONS

At Month 6, nearly three-quarters of TRD patients showed no response to standard of care and only 16.7% remission. Reaching response and especially remission was associated with a lower degree of functioning and productivity impairment healthcare resources use. This suggests that treatment failure considerably increases indirect and direct costs related to management of TRD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PMH23

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×