Access Limitations IMPACT on PCOS in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Tofacitinib or Biological Dmards in Real Life Conditions in Two LATIN-American Countries

Author(s)

Reyes Sanchez JM1, Gutierrez Ardila MV2, Ponce de Leon D3, Lukic T4
1Pfizer SAS, Bogota, CUN, Colombia, 2Pfizer Chile S.A., Santiago, Chile, 3Pfizer, Lima, Peru, 4Pfizer, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES : This study is aimed to describe the impact of access limitations on Patient Centered Outcomes (PCOs) in Latin-American patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib or biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) after failure to conventional DMARDs in real-life conditions.

METHODS:This was a non-interventional prospective study performed in Colombia and Peru between February-2017 to November-2019. Demographic, clinical and access characteristics (access limitations and time to supply [TtS]) were collected. The change between baseline and 6-month follow-up of following variables was measured: Disease activity (RAPID3 and DAS28), Functional Status (HAQ-DI), Health-related Quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). The impact of access limitation was determined describing the changes of PCOs expressed in Least Mean Difference (LMD) and TtS measured in mean number of days for delivery of treatment at baseline; variability measures were Standard Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SE).

RESULTS:

One hundred and seventy patients with mean age 53.53 (SD 13.77) years, mean years since RA diagnosis 6.31 (SD 7.02), treated with tofacitinib (n=70) or bDMARDs (n=100) were recruited. The mean TtS (SD) was 24.08 (30.59) for bDMARDs and 21.66 (44.80) for tofacitinib group; patients without access limitations were 81.43% (n=57) and 62.00% (n=62), respectively. In the bDMARDs group, the mean TtS was 22% longer in patients with access limitations compared to those without access limitations; for tofacitinib group TtS was 304% greater, respectively.

The baseline differences of PCOs (SE) in patients without access limitations were higher than those with access limitation for RAPID3 (LMD -3.56 (0.21) vs -1.13 (0.36)), HAQ-DI (LMD -0.79 (0.05) vs -0.29 (0.10)), EQ-5D-3L (LMD 0.45 (0.30) vs 0.18 (0.06)), and DAS28 (LMD -2.85 (0.30) vs -1.24 (0.57)).

CONCLUSIONS:Access limitations had a negative impact in the PCOs during the 6-months follow-up and longer TtS in RA patients. Therefore, it is a relevant factor for the achievement of better clinic results.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PMS80

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Policy & Regulatory, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Insurance Systems & National Health Care, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Public Health

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×