Budget IMPACT Analysis (BIA) of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for Molecular Assessment in Two Orthopaedic RARE Disease

Author(s)

Negro A1, Cicchetti A2, Di Brino E3, Pedrini E4, Pecoraro V5, Sculco C6
1Regional Agency for Health and Social Care of Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, BO, Italy, 2Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, 3Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, 4IRCSS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, BO, Italy, 5Modena Health Trust, Modena, Italy, 6University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the budget impact of a protocol with NGS-Ion Torrent™ equipment in substitution to one with traditional single-gene protocol (SGP) in two musculoskeletal rare diseases i.e. Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) and Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME) from the budget holder perspective.

METHODS: For each pathology, the analysis is accomplished on 200 individuals with clinical suspect or family history referring to the IOR clinic in Bologna-Italy. A Budget Impact model was performed considering the National Health Service perspective. The analysis applied the typical Activity Based Costing (ABC) methods in order to identify the cost drivers associated with each type of sequencing analysed. Variables studied include “materials”, “personnel”, “sequencing devices” costs. Sensitivity analysis (SA) is conducted to measure the impact on costs of the variation of the “working time” of personnel. Further, an annual scenario analysis is built on the results.

RESULTS: NGS, instead of SGP, decreases sequencing materials costs by €592 per single OI patient, and by €70 per single HME patient. When measuring the costs of personnel NGS offers a saving of €77 per single patient for OI and €4 for HME. Overall, the per-patient overall saving is €722 for OI and €85 for HME. Considering an annual incoming of 50 patients the saving due to the sequencing devices is €2.804 for OI and €612 for HME. The overall introducing NGS protocol produces a saving of € 37.565 for OI and € 4.441 for HME on the budget with respect to SGP protocol. SA confirms that in 100% of the simulations, adopting NGS offers significant savings in terms of costs and minutes, with homogeneous results for both protocols.

CONCLUSIONS: The economic analysis has shown that the strategy based on NGS allows to reduce costs, especially those related to the materials consumed.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PRO101

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×