Chemotherapy Treatments for Burkitt Lymphoma: Systematic Review of Interventional Studies
Author(s)
Della Rocca AM1, Leonart L2, Ferreira VL1, Tonin F1, Steffenello-Durigon G3, Del Moral JAG3, Fernandez-Llimos F4, Pontarolo R5
1Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 2Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 3University Hospital Professor Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 4Department of Drug Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 5Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy protocols for patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) considering the most up-to-date version of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues (2008 or later). METHODS: A systematic review of interventional studies was performed following the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (CRD42019131566). Searches limited to studies published after 2008 were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (Jan-2020). Studies’ methodological quality was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Qualitative and exploratory analyses were performed considering efficacy as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and safety (adverse events). RESULTS: From the 1,358 identified studies, nine non-randomized trials (n=544 patients) were included. BL epidemiological variants were: sporadic BL (sBL) (44.5%), endemic BL (eBL) (47.2%) and immunodeficiency-associated BL (iBL) (8.3%). Four groups of chemotherapy protocols were identified: CODOX-M/IVAC (n=4), EPOCH (n=1), BFM (n=1) and simplified schemes (e.g. without rituximab) used in Africa (n=3). Most studies had moderated methodological quality with limitations on design and lack of standardized reporting. For adults with sBL, best results were obtained with DA-EPOCH-R [OS-7 years: 100% (95%CI, 82-100)], HDR + LD with CODOX-M/IVAC (OS-2 years: 84%) and RD-CODOX-M/IVAC protocols [PFS-4 years: 92% (95%CI, 77-100)]. For pediatric patients with sBL, BFM-NHL-90-like protocol showed promising results (OS-3 years: 90%). For iBL, the SC-EPOCH-RR was found to be a good therapeutic option [OS-6 years: 90% (95%CI, 60-98)], while the Malawi 2012-2014 protocol [OS-1 year: 73% (95%CI, 61-85)] could be used for eBL. Hematological adverse events were commonly reported. CONCLUSIONS: According to the BL epidemiological variant, different chemotherapy protocols should be recommended. As the classification of the disease is important to guide treatment, peer reviewers should ensure that new trials are published using the most recent international criteria.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PCN27
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Drugs, Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic