Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Epilepsy Surgery As an Additional Treatment Option for Post-Stroke Epilepsy Patients on Medical Management in England Using Real World DATA
Author(s)
Wu CS1, Rabe A2, Betts A3, Bowditch S3, Jackson D4, McJennett I3, McClintock R5
1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2Global Health Focus, London, UK, 3UCB Pharma, Slough, UK, 4UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 5Health iQ, London, UK
OBJECTIVES : To determine cost-effectiveness of epilepsy surgery as an additional treatment option for post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) patients with medication management from the National Health Service (NHS) England perspective. METHODS : A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on Medline and Google Scholar to provide an overview regarding methodologies used for cost-effectiveness analysis in epilepsy and to provide baseline assumptions for modelling. We opted to do a discrete-event simulation model in order to incorporate patient characteristics which may vary across contexts. This modelling uses a time-to-event analysis since there is no pattern in epilepsy occurrence time. Our model ran deterministic (base-case study) and probabilistic (stochastic error taken into account through Monte Carlo sampling) analyses over a 5-year horizon with a 3.5% annual discount rate. Input parameters were sampled from 748 UK patients (75-year-old in average, 49% male, 83% ischemic stroke) gathered through a secondary care real world dataset, Hospital Episode Statistics. Primary outcomes were cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Uncertainty was measured using univariate sensitivity analysis. RESULTS : Among the four studies included in the SLR, three used discrete event simulation. When surgery performed as an additional treatment option on a PSE patient on medical management is compared with a scenario without surgery, our model estimates an incremental cost of £3,960 (£3,587), with a 0.041 (0.043) increase of QALYs, resulting in an ICER of £96,585 (£83,751) per QALY for deterministic and probabilistic analysis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS : Our modelling suggests offering epilepsy surgery in addition to medication management for PSE patients is unlikely to be cost-effective. Given the heterogenous nature of epilepsy patients, this model is not intended to limit access to epilepsy surgery but illustrate the economic impact in the PSE sub-population. Future studies to further characterize epilepsy and determine optimal treatment pathways are encouraged.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PND39
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Disease Management
Disease
Drugs, Neurological Disorders, Surgery