A Review of the Methods Used in Valuation Studies of Child/Adolescent Health-Related Quality of Life Using EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D.
Author(s)
Lenny A1, Shah K2
1PHMR Ltd, London, UK, 2PHMR Ltd, London, LON, UK
OBJECTIVES : Generic preference-based measures conventionally require their value sets to be based on stated preferences elicited from the relevant general population. However, the methods used in child/adolescent health valuation studies have received much less research compared to adult health valuation studies, hence, fewer child/adolescent-specific value sets have been developed. This is partly because the elicitation of child/adolescent health state preferences poses many normative, practical, and ethical issues. This presentation reviews the methods used to value EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D health states. These are two of the most prominent generic preference-based measures for child/adolescent populations. METHODS : A ‘citation pearl-growing’ approach was taken whereby the bibliographies of key papers were reviewed to identify further relevant studies. A data extraction template was designed to extract information such as sample type, preference elicitation method and framing perspective. RESULTS : 13 studies were included, of which seven have been published since 2015 and three in 2020 alone. Of the six EQ-5D-Y studies reviewed, all involved adults adopting a child’s perspective. Two of the studies also involved adolescents valuing their own health. In contrast, four of the seven CHU-9D studies involved adolescents valuing their own health. The four CHU-9D studies with samples including adults asked those adults to adopt an own health rather than a child’s perspective. Overall, the most common preference elicitation method was discrete choice experiment. Methods used in EQ-5D-Y studies were more varied compared to the CHU-9D studies. Online survey was the most common mode of administration. CONCLUSIONS : Very few valuation studies of EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D have been conducted, though there has been an increased focus on this research area in recent years. Further research is needed on the best practice for developing preference-based value sets for child/adolescent populations. This review was conducted in Q1 2020 and will be updated to include more recent publications.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PNS208
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Disease
No Specific Disease