RECENT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SCENARIO ACROSS THE EU-5 - A FOCUS ON MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Author(s)

Ghosh S1, Chatterjee M2, Saharia P3, Gurjar K3
1IQVIA, New Delhi, DL, India, 2IQVIA, Gurgaon, HR, India, 3IQVIA, Gurugram, HR, India

OBJECTIVES: The disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are expensive and a burden on healthcare systems. Decisions driving the reimbursement of currently available DMTs can help prepare appropriate strategies for pricing and reimbursement submissions in future. The objective of this analysis was to understand recent health technology assessments (HTAs) for MS therapies in EU-5 nations and identify the factors driving their reimbursement decisions.

METHODS: European Commission (EC)-approved drugs for MS were identified via European public assessment reports. A surveillance of recent HTA decisions in the EU-5 regions, namely UK (NICE, SMC, AWMSG), France (HAS), Italy (AIFA), Spain (AEMPS, AETSA) and Germany (G-BA, IQWiG) was done using IQVIA™ ’s proprietary platform ‘HTA Accelerator’ from 01/Jan/2015 to 01/06/2019.

RESULTS: Fourteen MS-specific DMTs have received EC approvals to date, with daclizumab being voluntary withdrawn post-approval for various safety reasons by the innovator. Forty-nine single drug assessments (SDAs) were carried out for these 14 drugs since 2015. Of these, the highest number of SDAs were for fingolimod (22.4%; n= 11) and ocrelizumab (20.4%; n= 10). Among the recently published 49 HTA decisions (SDAs), it was found that five negative recommendations were received for three DMTs in EU-5 [fingolimod (1 for G-BA), cladribine (1 for HAS and 1 for G-BA) and fampridine (1 for SMC and 1 for AWMSG)] owing to insufficient evidence justifying high cost or inability to demonstrate sufficient clinical effectiveness against the comparators.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite approval of several DMTs for MS in the EU-5 region, DMTs have confronted negative recommendations from HTA agencies for not being able to justify their high cost against comparators. Hence, further emphasis on robust economic analyses justifying price vis-à-vis clinical benefits are warranted to drive positive HTA recommendations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PND84

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×