HOW HAVE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT BODIES INTERPRETED THE EARLY EVIDENCE ON FREESTYLE LIBRE IN TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETES?

Author(s)

Levrat Guillen F1, Martin Saborido C2, Benhamou PY3, Beckerman R4, Blissett D5
1Abbott, London, UK, 2Health Sciences University Centre San Rafael Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, M, Spain, 3CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France, 4Maple Health Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 5MedTech Economics, Winchester, UK

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare conclusions and methodologies of all published HTA reports appraising FreeStyle Libre™ Flash Glucose Monitoring system, a glucose sensing technology used by persons with diabetes to manage their condition, since launch in September 2014 through October 2018.

METHODS: The literature search conducted in October 2018 aimed to identify all FreeStyle Libre™ HTA reports produced by HTA body. Inclusion criteria did not specify a date or language restriction. Data was extracted and results were analyzed under four themes: (1) assessment of clinical evidence; (2) assessment of economic evidence; (3) engagement with stakeholders; and (4) conclusions/recommendations.

RESULTS: In total 17 HTA reports were included in this analysis. All HTA reports included an assessment of the clinical evidence and 13 considered economic evidence. Despite uncertainties in the evidence base, a majority of HTA bodies concluded that compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose, FreeStyle Libre™ system reduces the frequency and time in hypoglycaemia and improved patient satisfaction. The majority of HTA reports that considered cost-effectiveness (n=6) reported that FreeStyle Libre™ system is a cost-effective intervention versus SMBG. Aspects of methodology that contributed to the most variation that warrant further consideration include the approach to quality assessment, the assessment of early evidence and incorporating stakeholder feedback.

CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarized in this review shows a wide range of results through the different HTA processes. This variation is due to the lack of clear processes of appraising medical devices. These issues are strongly related to delays in the availability of innovation for patients and clinicians. This review suggests that some of the challenges to conducting HTA in medical devices can be overcome by applying pragmatic approaches to adjust HTA processes and drawing on broader sources of evidence to support early adoption and help to manage the risks associated with uncertain evidence.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PMD35

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Medical Devices, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Systems & Structure

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×