THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS IN UK ADULTS

Author(s)

Cutler H1, Gumbie M2, Olin E1, Parkinson B1, Bowman R3, Quadri H4, Gonzalo F4
1Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, 2Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia, 3Health Technology Analysts, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 4Cochlear Limited, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES : In February 2019 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its guidance on eligibility criteria for unilateral cochlear implants in the UK. However, guidance on bilateral cochlear implants were not updated, despite advancements in technology, price reductions and refined treatment pathways. Research has shown significant improvements in clinical outcomes and quality of life following cochlear implantation (CI). Our objective was to update estimates of the cost-effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral CIs in adults in the UK.

METHODS : A Markov model with a lifetime horizon and National Health Service perspective was used to investigate the benefits and costs of no hearing aids, hearing aids, unilateral cochlear implants, simultaneous bilateral and sequential bilateral cochlear implants. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was undertaken to further assess the effect of uncertain model inputs on the cost effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Systematic literature reviews of economic evaluations and utilities were undertaken to inform the model. A clinical pathway was developed through consultation with clinical experts. Unit costs were derived from grey literature and clinical expert opinion. The ICER was compared to a cost effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained.

RESULTS : A unilateral CI is deemed cost effective when compared to a hearing aid or no hearing aid (ICER of £11,988 and £10,535 per QALY gained). Simultaneous bilateral (ICER of £17,795 and £15,840 per QALY gained) and sequential bilateral (ICER of £20,312 and £17,989 per QALY gained) CIs are potentially cost effective when compared to a hearing aid or no hearing aid, however they have a much lower likelihood of being cost effective when compared to a unilateral CI.

CONCLUSIONS : Estimated ICERs within this study reflect current data on the benefits and costs of CIs. Further research is required to capture additional benefits from a cochlear implant for bilateral CIs in adults.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PSS1

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Medical Devices, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Sensory System Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×