PHYSICIAN PERCEPTIONS OF BIOLOGICS VERSUS THEIR BIOSIMILAR COUNTERPARTS IN RHEUMATOLOGY- A MULTI-COUNTRY STUDY

Author(s)

ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN

OBJECTIVES

:
The objective of the study was to assess perceptions of efficacy and safety for biosimilars relative to branded biologic originator products among treating Rheumatologists in the EU5 countries (United Kingdom (UK), France (FR), Italy (IT), Spain (SP) and Germany (DE)).

METHODS

:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Q3 2018 in the EU5 among national, regional and hospital physicians who had been practicing between 3-30 years. Respondents completed a Physician Perceptual Questionnaire online, which assessed the overall perception of biologic brands and anti-TNF biosimilars, important attributes for treatments, and specific barriers to prescribing them. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

:
A total of 261 rheumatologists in the EU5 were recruited as part of the study. Treating rheumatologists were practicing for an average of 17.4 years, mainly in teaching hospitals (50.2%) and urban hospitals (20.7%)1. Physicians consistently expressed greater satisfaction for branded products, with 73.9% (range: 63.5% DE to 90.6% FR) of physicians having rated satisfaction with the originator brand of etanercept as a 6 or 7 (on a 7-point scale where 7 corresponded to highest satisfaction), compared to only 37.5% for biosimilar etanercept (range: 28.6% IT to 51.9% DE)1. When asked about specific attributes related to RA treatments, 64.4% of our sampled rheumatologists associated the originator brand of rituximab with ‘Inhibition of radiographic progression’ (range: 55.1% IT to 81.1% FR) – versus 47.5% association for biosimilar rituximab (range: 32.7% IT to 62.3% FR)1. .

CONCLUSIONS

:
Biosimilars score lower on overall satisfaction and are less frequently associated with specific efficacy attributes relative to branded products. This is possibly due to their relatively short time in clinical practice, and the resulting lack of experience and supporting data compared to the older branded equivalents. Proof of concept may be essential to close the perceptual gap that still exists between branded products and biosimilars.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PBI92

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Value of Information

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×