Author(s)
Lorenzoni V1, Convertino I2, Lucenteforte E3, Ferraro S2, Leonardi L2, Roberto G4, Luciano N5, Cazzato M5, Blandizzi C2, Gini R4, Tuccori M2, Mosca M5, Turchetti G6
1Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy, 2Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 3Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 4Tuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, Florence, Italy, 5Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 6Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
OBJECTIVES : To understand economic implications following the recommendation set in 2015 by Tuscan Health Authority to use infliximab-biosimilar (IFX-BI) using data from regional administrative databases. METHODS Using the Tuscan healthcare administrative databases we identified prevalent users of IFX on January 1st, 2013 (only infliximab-originator available, IFX-OR) and on January 1st, 2016 (infliximab-biosimilar recommended, IFX-BIorOR) for any indication. For each group, resources utilization related to IFX, other biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) and specialist visits were retrospectively collected over 2 years. Groups were matched by propensity score (PS) method using age, gender, diagnoses and treatment history as matching variables. Direct costs were then compared between groups using generalized linear regression model adjusting for covariates and considering robust standard error. RESULTS : Out of 454 IFX-OR and 434 IFX-BIorOR users retrieved, after the PS matching the study cohort was composed by 303 cases in each group and patients were well matched. Over 2 years median per-patients overall costs were significantly lower in the IFX-BIorOR group (16,186€ [10,230-23,334€] vs 17,900[12,101-25,925€], p=0.011), in particular IFX costs were also significantly lower in that group (10,210€ [2,792-16,333€] vs 13,155€ [4,872-20,463€], p<0.001). At multivariable analysis the IFX-BIorOR group showed borderline similar costs (p=0.05); indeed in this group IFX costs were significantly lower (p<0.001), costs for ED and specialist visits were higher (p>0.001 for both) while hospitalization costs were similar between groups (p=0.472). CONCLUSIONS : Results showed that the introduction of BI significantly reduced costs associated to drug consumption. The impact on the overall costs was borderline significant because treatment savings were compensated by higher costs for specialist and ED visits. These higher costs likely reflect a precautionary approach to the use of IFX-BI from both clinicians and patients. Further studies are needed to clarify mechanisms underlining the economic impact highlighted in this preliminary evaluation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark
Code
PBI90
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Disease
Alternative Medicine