SECUKINUMAB VS. ADALIMUMAB AND INFLIXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS- A COST PER RESPONDER ANALYSIS AT 52 WEEKS FROM A GREEK PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Daoussis D1, Theofanidis N2, Kalogeropoulou M3
1University of Patras Medical School, Patras University Hospital, Dept. Of Rheumatology, Patra, Greece, 2NOVARTIS HELLAS SACI, Pireas, Greece, 3Novartis Hellas SACI employee during the time that study was conducted, Metamorphosis, Greece

OBJECTIVES : This analysis estimated and compared long-term Cost Per Responder (CPR) based on the ASAS outcomes following 52 weeks treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with Secukinumab (SEC), compared to Adalimumab (ADA) and Infliximab (INF) for Greek NHS

METHODS

:
Analysis is based on a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). CPR calculated using long-term response rates from MAIC based on MEASURE 2, ATLAS & ADEPT RCTs. The CPR was estimated by dividing drug acquisition cost for the course of treatment with its response rate. Drug costs were based on December 2017 price bulletin and the number of doses required for 52 weeks. (infliximab administration cost also estimated).

RESULTS : MAIC showed that ASAS response rates were significantly higher for SEC compared to ADA at 52 weeks. ASAS20 response rates were 81% vs 65%, ASAS40 response rates were 62% vs. 47% and ASAS5/6 response rates were 72% vs. 55% for SEC and ADA, respectively. The CPR for ASAS20 responders were €7,073 vs. €10,139, for ASAS40 responders were €9,195 vs. €14,096 & for ASAS5/6 responders were €7,918 vs. €12,061 for SEC and ADA, respectively. The CPR for ASAS20/40/5/6 responders were 34%/38%/38% lower, respectively, for SEC compared to ADA. ACR20 response rates were 91% vs. 69% & ASAS5/6 response rates were 33% vs. 23% for SEC and INF, respectively. CPR for ACR20 responders were €6,298 vs. €16,046 & for ASAS5/6 responders were €17,281 vs €47,746 for SEC and INF, respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed results robustness.

CONCLUSIONS : The CPR for all ASAS outcomes at 52 weeks were consistently lower for SEC vs. ADA and INF, leading to important savings for Greek Social Security Fund . These findings indicate that may be more efficient treat AS biologic naive patients in Greece with SEC vs. ADA or INF. A potential weakness is that the comparison between drugs is indirect and based on a statistical model.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PBI20

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×